2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20072024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Save Muscle Information–Unfiltered EEG Signal Helps Distinguish Sleep Stages

Abstract: Based on the well-established biopotential theory, we hypothesize that the high frequency spectral information, like that higher than 100Hz, of the EEG signal recorded in the off-the-shelf EEG sensor contains muscle tone information. We show that an existing automatic sleep stage annotation algorithm can be improved by taking this information into account. This result suggests that if possible, we should sample the EEG signal with a high sampling rate, and preserve as much spectral information as possible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, while the spectral slope performed better than beta power for classifying REM versus NREM ( p = 10 −15 , 73.7% versus 66.8%), it was worse for classifying wake versus NREM ( p < 10 −43 , 75.6% versus 87.2%). Although higher frequency EEG activity may - as others have suggested 33 - be an informative (and often overlooked) feature for distinguishing REM from wake, potentially driven by the EMG content of the high frequency EEG, we did not find evidence that the spectral slope per se is an optimal parameterization for this particular goal. Indeed, here beta or gamma band power alone performed similarly (equivalent results were observed for relative power).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…In contrast, while the spectral slope performed better than beta power for classifying REM versus NREM ( p = 10 −15 , 73.7% versus 66.8%), it was worse for classifying wake versus NREM ( p < 10 −43 , 75.6% versus 87.2%). Although higher frequency EEG activity may - as others have suggested 33 - be an informative (and often overlooked) feature for distinguishing REM from wake, potentially driven by the EMG content of the high frequency EEG, we did not find evidence that the spectral slope per se is an optimal parameterization for this particular goal. Indeed, here beta or gamma band power alone performed similarly (equivalent results were observed for relative power).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…In contrast, while the spectral slope performed better than beta power for classifying REM versus NREM (p = 10 -15 , 73.7% versus 66.8%), it was worse for classifying wake versus NREM (p < 10 -43 , 75.6% versus 87.2%). Although higher frequency EEG activity may -as others have suggested (Liu et al, 2020) -be an informative (and often overlooked) feature for distinguishing REM from wake, potentially driven by the EMG content of the high frequency EEG, we did not find evidence that the spectral slope per se is an optimal parameterization for this particular goal. Indeed, here beta alone performed similarly (see Figure 4-1 for results with all classic frequency bands).…”
Section: Potential Non-neural Confounders Of the Spectral Slopecontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Toward the other end of this spectrum, during drowsiness, the infra-slow global dynamic may prolong the memory consolidation phase whereas hinder encodings. The SM-to-DMN waves have been found to occur more frequently during various sleep stages and be associated with learning-related features (i.e., the rapid eye movements and possibly Ponto-Geniculo-Occipital (PGO) waves) during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (59). Though not directly focused on the cascade and waves, recent studies convergingly point out an essential role of infra-slow neural dynamics in learning and memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%