Saving Languages

Grenoble, Lenore A.; Whaley, Lindsay J.

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615931

Cited by 116 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 72 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Fishman, afirma que existen ciertos conceptos llamados ámbitos o dominios en los cuales el uso de una variedad lingüística es más apropiado que el uso de la otra. Grenoble & Whaley (2006) expresan que los dominios son determinados geográficamente, con una lengua local utilizada en la comunidad local, ya sea socialmente, en tiendas, en encuentros, con fines educativos y forma de discurso público. El entrevistado 7, explica cómo se han abierto estos ámbitos de aprendizaje como los abuelos en las comunidades y se espera que se sigan ampliando.…”

Section: Elección Lingüísticaunclassified

Language and Identity

Tabouret‐Keller

2017

The Handbook of Sociolinguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Elección Lingüísticaunclassified

Language and Identity

Tabouret‐Keller

2017

The Handbook of Sociolinguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The requirement of a change in attitudes (cf. Grenoble and Whaley 2006), conscious efforts (cf. Wallace 1956), and future-oriented attempts (cf.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

From the Árran to the Internet: Sami Storytelling in Digital Environments

Cocq¹

2013

ort

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This essay investigates the use of storytelling in the process of cultural and linguistic revitalization through specific contemporary examples drawn from the Internet. By examining instances of adaptation of Sami tales and legends to digital environments, I discuss new premises and challenges for the emergence of such narratives. In particular, within a contemporary context characterized by an increasing variety of media and channels, as well as by an improvement in minority politics, it is important to examine how expressive culture and traditional modes of expression are transposed and negotiated. The rich Sami storytelling tradition is a central form of cultural expression. Its role in the articulation of norms, values, and discourses within the community has been emphasized in previous research (Balto 1997; Cocq 2008; Fjellström 1986); it is a means for learning and communicating valuable knowledge-a shared understanding. Legends and tales convey information, educate, socialize, and entertain. Their role within contemporary inreach and outreach initiatives is explored in this essay from the perspective of adaptation and revitalization. As I emphasize, the explicit goals in minority politics are factors that have an effect on the selection and adaptation of Sami expressive culture. From this perspective, the Internet is approached as a place of creation and negotiation for traditional storytelling through a case study that I hope will offer a relevant contribution to other indigenous communities. Additionally, this study illustrates how the potential of the Internet has to be nuanced and interpreted in relation to offline practices regarding such materials and traditions. Stigmatized Cultures, Endangered Languages, and Revitalization The Sami population lives in the Sápmi area that encompasses northern parts of Norway, Sweden, Finland, and the Kola Peninsula in Russia. According to the Swedish Sami parliament, the Sami population is about 80,000-95,000, but the lack of a census based on ethnicity makes this estimate imprecise. In the definition applied by the Sami parliaments, language and selfascription are the criteria that characterize who is Sami. The prerequisites for the Sami minorities in the four countries have varied and affected different Sami groups to various extents, but policies of cultural assimilation were a common denominator until the Second World War

show abstract

“…Pendidikan merupakan ranah penting penggunaan bahasa. Pada wilayah yang menyelenggarakan sistem pendidikan secara nasional atau regional, bahasa Pendidikan menjadi penentu utama penggunaan bahasa di ranah-ranah lain (Grenoble & Whaley, 2006 dan muruah bahasa (bentuk bahasa tinggi dan rendah), politik dan nasionalis, serta motivasi religius (Karan, 2011). Dalam konteks masyarakat Adang di Adang Buom, motivasi yang mendorong penutur untuk tidak menggunakan bahasa daerahnya di ranah tertentu, tetapi menggunakan bahasa Indonesia (Melayu-Alor) tampaknya bersifat komunikatif, ekonomi, prestisius, dan religius.…”

Section: ) Penggunaan Bahasa Adang DI Ranah Rumahunclassified

Bahasa Adang di Pulau Alor: Kajian Vitalitas Etnolinguistik

Inayatusshalihah

Sudarmaji

2020

RNH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Saving Languages

Cited by 116 publications

References 72 publications

Language and Identity

Language and Identity

From the Árran to the Internet: Sami Storytelling in Digital Environments

Bahasa Adang di Pulau Alor: Kajian Vitalitas Etnolinguistik

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About