2019
DOI: 10.1101/653212
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saving Old Bones: a non-destructive method for bone collagen prescreening

Abstract: Bone collagen is an important material for radiocarbon, paleodietary, and paleoproteomic analyses, but it degrades over time. Various methods have been employed to prescreen bone for collagen preservation, but these are often destructive and/or require exportation for analysis.Here we show that near-infrared spectroscopy can be used to determine bone collagen content quickly and non-destructively on site.r

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elemental analysis provides information of %Nitrogen and %Carbon preserved in a bone, for example 54 . Fourier Transform Infra-Red Spectroscopy (FTIR) is very helpful in this regard and can be performed without loss of sample material [55][56][57][58][59][60] . Chemical pretreatment of the sample material may either remove contamination with carbonates using acid such as solution of hydrochloric acid when looking at soil organic carbon, for example 61,62 , and/or isolate a particular chemical fraction from a complex mixture known to be less prone to contamination than other components, such as is the case when isolating collagen from a whole bone.…”
Section: [H2] Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elemental analysis provides information of %Nitrogen and %Carbon preserved in a bone, for example 54 . Fourier Transform Infra-Red Spectroscopy (FTIR) is very helpful in this regard and can be performed without loss of sample material [55][56][57][58][59][60] . Chemical pretreatment of the sample material may either remove contamination with carbonates using acid such as solution of hydrochloric acid when looking at soil organic carbon, for example 61,62 , and/or isolate a particular chemical fraction from a complex mixture known to be less prone to contamination than other components, such as is the case when isolating collagen from a whole bone.…”
Section: [H2] Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Preservation status of the tooth/teeth: are they well preserved or not? Other than visual inspections, this can be further tested using various non-destructive methods such as near-infrared spectroscopy, 50 fluorescence imaging, 24 and micro-computed tomography screening and ion beam analysis. 51 • Analytical resources: access to instrumentation, funding, time, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C, N, and S)? Preservation status of the tooth/teeth: are they well preserved or not? Other than visual inspections, this can be further tested using various non‐destructive methods such as near‐infrared spectroscopy, 50 fluorescence imaging, 24 and micro‐computed tomography screening and ion beam analysis 51 Analytical resources: access to instrumentation, funding, time, etc. Similar to most techniques, there are pros and cons associated with either approach, but with careful mitigations and/or tactful compromises, some cons may be avertible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study could be planned to establish the age of the specimens, the gender, the possible diseases, and the presence and degree of osteoporosis. For this purpose, the bones could be subjected to (i) microphotography of all samples; (ii) computed tomography (CT); (iii) dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) 77 ; (iv) near‐infrared spectroscopy for gauging the collagen content 78 ; (v) if authorized, radiocarbon dating 79 ; (vi) if authorized, ancient DNA analysis 80 ; (vii) if authorized, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP‐MS) 81 performed for establishing or unraveling diet and social status of the deaths and finding trace elements of Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Sr, Ba, and Pb. Note that methods of the points (i)–(iv) do not need destruction of the samples, while methods (v)–(vii) are based on the destruction of micro‐fragments of the specimens, that is, about 1–2 mm (roughly, 1–40 mg), for each examination.…”
Section: Solution To the Abelardian Quandarymentioning
confidence: 99%