2018
DOI: 10.1556/2062.2018.65.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sawing off the branch you are sitting on

Abstract: This article argues that vowel reduction can be insightfully understood by reinterpreting openness as structural instead of melodic (i.e., mediated by an element). This allows for a unified account of various reduction phenomena in different languages and also extends to lenition in consonants. The proposal made here is couched within Government Phonology 2.0, a further development of Government Phonology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But none of those authors assume internal structure in the sense that [e] could be a substructure of [ɛ] etc. The same applies toClements (1991) and his splitting up of [open] into [open 1 ], [open 2 ] etc.38 This deviates minimally from the original proposal inPöchtrager (2018), but is more in line with the findings inPöchtrager (2017;2020) and with the argumentation developed here. Vowel reduction is of course more complex and varied than given here, cf Pöchtrager (2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But none of those authors assume internal structure in the sense that [e] could be a substructure of [ɛ] etc. The same applies toClements (1991) and his splitting up of [open] into [open 1 ], [open 2 ] etc.38 This deviates minimally from the original proposal inPöchtrager (2018), but is more in line with the findings inPöchtrager (2017;2020) and with the argumentation developed here. Vowel reduction is of course more complex and varied than given here, cf Pöchtrager (2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…elements) has been replaced by structure. As a result, many cases of lenition, both for consonants (Pöchtrager 2016) and vowels (Pöchtrager 2018), have been reinterpreted as structural as well. This can mean one of two things, as given in ( 22).…”
Section: Why Coronals? Clues From Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30 Schane (1984) also pointed out that the prime |A| is different, in the sense that it is the only one that can be reduplicated within a segmental expression. 31 Similarly, Pöchtrager (2018) discusses the legitimacy of |A| in the element inventory and proposes to analyze it-like aspiration-as a structural configuration. More precisely, the property encapsulated by |A|-openness-could be represented with (an) empty 30 Backley (2011) analyzes phenomena such as r-linking and pharyngealization as |A| spreading, which supports the primitive status of |A|.…”
Section: The Faroese Monophthongsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GP2, reduction consists of the loss of the highest layer of /e/. The remaining part, the level containing xN|I| and x1, is equivalent to the vowel [i] (Pöchtrager 2018). ( 23 Note that when mid vowels are long (as in 22a, 23a, and 24a), two potential targets can be m-commanded by the head to express length: x1 or x2.…”
Section: The Faroese Monophthongsmentioning
confidence: 99%