2018
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2018.2876551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable Compact Modeling of III–V DHBTs: Prospective Figures of Merit Toward Terahertz Operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new technology generation shows a similar f T compared to the previous generation [34]. The reduction in the transit time with emitter width scaling has been observed at high current densities, which can be attributed to a pronounced collector current spreading in smaller emitter dimensions [34], leading to larger critical current and smaller transit time values. Small emitter dimension particularly poses a challenge to maintain an acceptable current gain (β), of which rather low (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) values have been reported for the 0.13 µm InP HBT process [1,33].…”
Section: Extrapolation Of Figures Of Merits To State-of-the-art (013mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The new technology generation shows a similar f T compared to the previous generation [34]. The reduction in the transit time with emitter width scaling has been observed at high current densities, which can be attributed to a pronounced collector current spreading in smaller emitter dimensions [34], leading to larger critical current and smaller transit time values. Small emitter dimension particularly poses a challenge to maintain an acceptable current gain (β), of which rather low (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) values have been reported for the 0.13 µm InP HBT process [1,33].…”
Section: Extrapolation Of Figures Of Merits To State-of-the-art (013mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The extrapolated f T and f MAX are compared with that of the 0.13 × 2 µm 2 state-of-the-art for a V CE of 1 V. The predicted peak f T [ Figure 22a] shows that a higher value can be expected compared to the reported value for the experimental devices [33]. The new technology generation shows a similar f T compared to the previous generation [34]. The reduction in the transit time with emitter width scaling has been observed at high current densities, which can be attributed to a pronounced collector current spreading in smaller emitter dimensions [34], leading to larger critical current and smaller transit time values.…”
Section: Extrapolation Of Figures Of Merits To State-of-the-art (013mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Low-frequency S-parameters have been measured on 7 device geometries [3] using the measurement setup described in section II. Fig.…”
Section: Compact Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacitance, COPEN, corresponds to the device open capacitance and is quite low (typically, around a few fF). Transient simulations were performed with HiCuM model using a fully calibrated model card for the InGaAs/InP DHBTs [3], taking in account, additionally, the proposed thermal network model. The transient simulations are performed under the bias conditions VBE=0.85V and VCE=1.2 V for the geometry 0.7×5 µm 2 , with an applied pulse width of 500ns and a pulse delay of 200ns.…”
Section: Validation With Pulse Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation