2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2016.7798443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable monitoring of interconnected stochastic systems

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we propose a novel distributed fault detection method to monitor the state of a linear system, partitioned into interconnected subsystems. The approach hinges on the definition of a partition-based distributed Luenberger estimator, based on the local model of the subsystems and that takes into account the dynamic coupling terms between the subsystems. The proposed methodology computes -in a distributed way -a bound on the variance of a properly defined residual signal, considering the u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main benefits of using a distributed fault diagnosis scheme can be summarized as follows: a) enhanced robustness of the monitoring architecture, since centralized approaches are subject to single-point-of-failure, b) reduced computation costs, c) scalability benefits; the distributed scheme allows for more flexibility in adding subsystems with respective fault detection modules requiring fewer and possibly local modifications in the already existing architecture. Moreover, an emerging requirement is the design of monitoring architectures that are robust to changes that may occur in the dynamic topology of the large scale systems, allowing the addition/disconnection of subsystem to/from the network of interconnected subsystems only requiring local operations (see for example [78,11,13]).…”
Section: Distributed and Networked Large-scale Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main benefits of using a distributed fault diagnosis scheme can be summarized as follows: a) enhanced robustness of the monitoring architecture, since centralized approaches are subject to single-point-of-failure, b) reduced computation costs, c) scalability benefits; the distributed scheme allows for more flexibility in adding subsystems with respective fault detection modules requiring fewer and possibly local modifications in the already existing architecture. Moreover, an emerging requirement is the design of monitoring architectures that are robust to changes that may occur in the dynamic topology of the large scale systems, allowing the addition/disconnection of subsystem to/from the network of interconnected subsystems only requiring local operations (see for example [78,11,13]).…”
Section: Distributed and Networked Large-scale Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation modelx I (t) for x I (t) under fault-free operation is generated based on (1.1) by considering only the known components and by using the measurements m I and m zI as follows: 11) with the initial conditionx I (0) = m I (0). The corresponding estimation model for y I, f (t), denoted byŷ I, f (t), is given bŷ 12) and by using (1.11) and following a similar procedure as in the derivation of (1.10), y I, f (t) becomes:…”
Section: Distributed Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this connection, in the recent paper [23], a fault detection and isolation method is proposed with probabilistic performance, but considering a centralized architecture. In [24], stochastic uncertainties are considered for a distributed FDI architecture, but in a completely different setting (non-overlapping models, linear dynamics, output measurements only, different assumptions on disturbances which require a distributed Kalman-like filtering scheme).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Preliminary results have been presented in the very recent paper [1]. Compared with [1], a more comprehensive theoretical analysis is provided and extensive numerical results are given. For example, the conservativeness of the bound on the error covariance matrix is analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%