2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable prediction of non-functional properties in software product lines: Footprint and memory consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental corpus of our evaluation is composed by a benchmark of 118 feature models, whose number of products ranges from 16 to 640 products, that are publicly available from the SPL Conqueror [16] and the SPLOT [17] repositories. The objectives to optimize are the 3 Available at URL: http://minisat.se/MiniSat+.html Algorithm 1 Algorithm for obtaining the optimal Pareto set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental corpus of our evaluation is composed by a benchmark of 118 feature models, whose number of products ranges from 16 to 640 products, that are publicly available from the SPL Conqueror [16] and the SPLOT [17] repositories. The objectives to optimize are the 3 Available at URL: http://minisat.se/MiniSat+.html Algorithm 1 Algorithm for obtaining the optimal Pareto set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of the performance of individual variants is subject to intensive research. Approaches usually handle a small sample of measured variants and seek to understand the correlation between configurations and performance [15,27,30,34,37]. The e↵ectiveness of statistical learning techniques and regression methods have been empirically studied.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the robustness and reliability of measurements would mean to multiply the times by a factor of 10 or higher. Even feature-wise measurement (as explained next) requires more measurements for our subject programs, but with a higher error rate, as it does not consider feature interactions at all [34]. For illustration, we depict in Table 2 the times needed for familybased performance measurement in relation to the times needed to measure all variants (in brackets).…”
Section: Ajstats 15s (53d)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Does family-based performance measurement outperform state-of-the-art sampling approaches: (a) feature-wise and (b) pair-wise measurement [34]? Feature-wise measurement samples the customizable program to quantify the influence of each feature on performance.…”
Section: Ajstats 15s (53d)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation