“…Representations of individual Nups and some of their subcomplexes (Supplementary Table 2 and references therein) relied on (1) atomic structures of 21 yeast Nup domains and 3 sub-complexes determined by X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy; (2) our structures of Nup116, Nup133, Nup145N, Nup192, and Pom152, as well as the Nup82 and Nup84 sub-complexes solved by integrative structure determination 43,66,72,88–92 ; (3) 29 comparative models built with MODELLER 9.13 108 based on the known structure(s) detected by HHPred 109,110 and the literature; (4) SAXS profiles for 147 constructs of 18 Nups 43,72,88–92 (Supplementary Table 6; manuscript in preparation); (5) secondary structure, disordered regions, and domain boundaries predicted by PSIPRED 111,112 , DISOPRED 113 , and DomPred 114 , respectively; (6) coiled-coil regions of Nup82, Nup159, Nsp1, Nup49, Nup57, Mlp1, and Mlp2 predicted by COILS/PCOILS 115 and Multicoil2 116 ; (7) an atomic structure of the Nup53 229–365 RRM domain from S. cerevisiae determined by X-ray crystallography (manuscript in preparation); and (8) the negative-stain EM density maps of full-length Nup192 (EMD-5556 92 ) and Pom152 (EMD-8543 43 ). See Supplementary Table 2 and references therein.…”