Scale dependence of vegetation–environment relationships: a meta‐analysis of multivariate data

Abstract

Questions How does spatial scale (extent and grain) influence the relative importance of different environmental factors as determinants of plant community composition? Are there general scale thresholds that mark the transition from primarily edaphic to primarily climatic control of plant communities? Location Global. Methods We surveyed the empirical literature and identified 89 analyses from 63 published studies that analysed vegetation–environment relationships involving at least two categories of predictor variables (edaphic, climatic, topographic, biotic, spatial or disturbance‐related). For each analysis, we identified the primary predictor variable (i.e. the variable that explained the most variation in community composition) and the relative effect size of the best predictor variable from each category. We defined ‘primacy’ as the proportion of times a variable category was primary when it was measured, and analysed primacy and the relative effect size of each category as a function of spatial extent and grain. We also analysed the subset of studies that measured both edaphic and climatic variables to identify spatial extent and grain thresholds for the primacy of these factors. We surveyed the empirical literature and identified 89 analyses from 63 published studies that analysed vegetation–environment relationships involving at least two categories of predictor variables (edaphic, climatic, topographic, biotic, spatial or disturbance‐related). For each analysis, we identified the primary predictor variable (i.e. the variable that explained the most variation in community composition) and the relative effect size of the best predictor variable from each category. We defined ‘primacy’ as the proportion of times a variable category was primary when it was measured, and analysed primacy and the relative effect size of each category as a function of spatial extent and grain. We also analysed the subset of studies that measured both edaphic and climatic variables to identify spatial extent and grain thresholds for the primacy of these factors. Results Edaphic variables had the highest primacy in the overall data set and at fine grain sizes (<200 m2), but there were no strong trends in primacy across studies of varying spatial extent. We detected trends of increasing relative effect size of climatic variables with increasing spatial extent, and decreasing relative effect size of edaphic variables with increasing spatial grain, although these patterns were not statistically significant. Among studies that measured both edaphic and climatic variables, the importance of climate factors relative to edaphic factors increased with increasing spatial extent and grain, with scale thresholds of 1995 km2 for extent and 295 m2 for grain. Conclusions Our study illustrates that vegetation–environment relationships depend on the spatial scale (extent and grain) of observation and provide empirical support for the view that there is a transition from a primarily edaphic influence to a primarily climatic influence o...

Mediterranean landscapes and plant communities relationship

“…There is partial agreement, too, with the findings reported by Siefert et al (2012), who studied the influence of spatial scale on the relative importance of climate or soils in determining the floristic composition of plant communities. From 89 analyses derived from 63 different studies, they concluded that there is a transition from a primarily edaphic influence to a primarily climate-related influence as the spatial scale increases.…”

Floristic dynamics across a semi-arid volcanic chronosequence in northern Arizona

“…It has long been recognized that besides climate, the edaphic factor chiefly drives the geographic distribution of plant species (Good, 1931). A recent meta-analysis by Siefert et al (2012) corroborates an oft-held view among ecologists and geographers that climate strongly influences the vegetation-environment relationship at larger scales while edaphic factors are relatively more important at smaller spatial scales.…”

The complex adaptive character of spring fens as model ecosystems

“…The three major principles of CAS theory discussed in this article (complex interaction, adaptation and scale dependence) are subject to major interest and intensive research efforts in ecology and biogeography (e.g., Levin 1992, Pearson and Dawson 2003, Folke 2006, Siefert et al 2012. However interactions between these principles in affecting ecosystem dynamics have rarely been tackled.…”