72nd Device Research Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/drc.2014.6872344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling analysis of in-plane and perpendicular anisotropy magnetic tunnel junctions using a physics-based model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Write-currents are thus Table I. indicative of the write failures. We chose a WER of 7.95e-7 [7] and a switching time of 4 ns for our analysis (without loss of generality). To obtain realistic results, we have chosen material parameters from experimental data, summarized in Table I.…”
Section: A Write Current Trends For Iso-wer and Iso-switching Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Write-currents are thus Table I. indicative of the write failures. We chose a WER of 7.95e-7 [7] and a switching time of 4 ns for our analysis (without loss of generality). To obtain realistic results, we have chosen material parameters from experimental data, summarized in Table I.…”
Section: A Write Current Trends For Iso-wer and Iso-switching Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…were selected for a retention time of 10 years. The chosen (mentioned in Table II) have been adopted from [7] where authors estimated for L3 cache assuming a retention time of 10 years. The details of calculations based on failure rates and retention time can be found in [7].…”
Section: T-1mtj Scaling Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…14, it is clear that, in principle, perpendicular MTJ devices, independent of their size, will require an approximately constant switching current I c0 once the target for D is established based on the requirements for the MTJ in the nonvolatile circuit. This presents a fundamental problem for the scaling trend of perpendicular MTJ devices, as the transistors needed to drive this constant switching current will not significantly shrink with successive technology nodes [61][62][63], hence limiting the possibility to scale the transistors of the nonvolatile circuits and making the circuit area possibly constrained by the area of the transistors instead of the NVM element. However, a recent work by Sato et al [64] experimentally Handbook of Spintronics DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7604-3_42-1 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 studying the scaling of I c0 and D on devices down to 11 nm shows that, even though the scaling trend predicted in section "Perpendicular MTJ Devices" is accurately followed for D in perpendicular MTJ devices below $30 nm, the figure of merit I c0 /D is experimentally observed to decrease as the device shrinks, which may be attributed to the reduction of the effective damping in Eq.…”
Section: Spin-transfer Torque (Stt)mentioning
confidence: 99%