2015
DOI: 10.1111/maps.12560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling and reproducibility of craters produced at the Experimental Projectile Impact Chamber (EPIC), Centro de Astrobiología, Spain

Abstract: The Experimental Projectile Impact Chamber (EPIC) is a specially designed facility for the study of processes related to wet-target (e.g., "marine") impacts. It consists of a 7 m wide, funnel-shaped test bed, and a 20.5 mm caliber compressed N 2 gas gun. The target can be unconsolidated or liquid. The gas gun can launch 20 mm projectiles of various solid materials under ambient atmospheric pressure and at various angles from the horizontal. To test the functionality and quality of obtained results by EPIC, imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimentally derived crater relationships are based on final crater diameters. But because of the small degree (i.e., ~10% differences between the transient and final crater diameters, both measured from the preimpact surface) of final crater collapse in experiments [e.g., Ormö et al ., ; Wünnemann et al ., ], these crater relationships are comparable with our numerical results derived from transient crater diameters. When available, the friction coefficient and porosity values were taken from references specified in Table .…”
Section: Numerical Experimentssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Experimentally derived crater relationships are based on final crater diameters. But because of the small degree (i.e., ~10% differences between the transient and final crater diameters, both measured from the preimpact surface) of final crater collapse in experiments [e.g., Ormö et al ., ; Wünnemann et al ., ], these crater relationships are comparable with our numerical results derived from transient crater diameters. When available, the friction coefficient and porosity values were taken from references specified in Table .…”
Section: Numerical Experimentssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…; Ormö et al. ) and varied the parameters slightly until we achieved a satisfactory match with the observed crater dimensions in the laboratory experiments of Series II. The same parameters were then also used for the models of Series I.…”
Section: Methods Of Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Ormö et al. () found a compatible ratio of 1.1 in similar cratering experiments in sand. Note, for natural simple craters on earth, Melosh (; page 129, Eq.…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…At the laboratory scale, the difference between final (post‐collapse) and transient (pre‐collapse) crater radius (at the preimpact level) is typically <10% (e.g., Ormö et al. ; Wünnemann et al. ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%