2005
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling constraints in nanoelectronic random-access memories

Abstract: Nanoelectronic molecular and magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) MRAM crossbar memory systems have the potential to present significant area advantages (4 to 6F(2)) compared to CMOS-based systems. The scalability of these conductivity-switched RAM arrays is examined by establishing criteria for correct functionality based on the readout margin. Using a combined circuit theoretical modelling and simulation approach, the impact of both the device and interconnect architecture on the scalability of a conductivity-stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2,3] Several valuable concepts have been proposed for developing the next generation of memory devices including spin-based and ferromagnetism-based devices. [4][5][6] Over the past decade, several concepts for molecular electronics, defined as molecular-level electronic systems, that only use a few electrons for operation have been introduced. This novel electronic design has the potential to resolve the technological challenges currently facing the industry and open up new strategies for enhancing device integration density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3] Several valuable concepts have been proposed for developing the next generation of memory devices including spin-based and ferromagnetism-based devices. [4][5][6] Over the past decade, several concepts for molecular electronics, defined as molecular-level electronic systems, that only use a few electrons for operation have been introduced. This novel electronic design has the potential to resolve the technological challenges currently facing the industry and open up new strategies for enhancing device integration density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive analytical studies have been carried out in the area of nano crossbar memory design [2], [40]- [43]. Here we extend these studies and also the comprehensive analytical framework, introduced early in this section, to the simulation of the memristive and CRS-based arrays.…”
Section: A Simulations Of Crossbar Arraymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The cross-point element could be either a CRS device or a memristor. In order to read any stored bit in R i,j , similar to many other reported schemes [2], [40]- [42], here we apply V pu = V READ to the i th bitline, j th word-line is grounded, and all other word and bit lines are floating. A direct benefit of this approach is the pull-up resistor (R pu ) can be implemented in nano domain [41].…”
Section: Crossbar Memory Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example of these sneak paths is shown in Figure 12.2. The impact of the sneak paths on the reading and writing operations of crossbar arrays has been analyzed in numerous papers [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Crossbar Array and Memory Select Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%