Scaling, dimensional analysis, and indentation measurements

Abstract

We provide an overview of the basic concepts of scaling and dimensional analysis, followed by a review of some of the recent work on applying these concepts to modeling instrumented indentation measurements. Specifically, we examine conical and pyramidal indentation in elastic-plastic solids with power-law workhardening, in power-law creep solids, and in linear viscoelastic materials. We show that the scaling approach to indentation modeling provides new insights into several basic questions in instrumented indentation, including, what information is contained in the indentation load-displacement curves? How does hardness depend on the mechanical properties and indenter geometry? What are the factors determining piling-up and sinking-in of surface profiles around indents? Can stress-strain relationships be obtained from indentation load-displacement curves? How to measure time dependent mechanical properties from indentation? How to detect or confirm indentation size effects? The scaling approach also helps organize knowledge and provides a framework for bridging micro-and macroscales. We hope that this review will accomplish two purposes: (1) introducing the basic concepts of scaling and dimensional analysis to materials scientists and engineers, and (2) providing a better understanding of instrumented indentation measurements. # 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Mechanical Properties of a Dental Nano-Composite in Moist Media Determined by Nano-Scale Measurement

“…According to the manufacturer's instructions, both sides of samples were light cured for 20 seconds until the polymerization was carried out. Dimensional analysis applied to the samples used in the nano-indentation experiment showed that for a homogeneous material, the indentation test results were independent of all dimensions except depth [28], [29].…”

Development of DLC coating architectures for demanding functional surface applications through nano- and micro-mechanical testing

“…At low relative indentation depth the substrate contribution is minimal and the observed differences in x are due to differences in coating properties. FE analysis has predicted x ~5 [17][18] whilst for bulk materials experimental evidence suggests that x ~ 5 for glasses and x ~6-7 for metals [19][20]. For hard coating systems x has been reported to be ~6.4 on TiN-based nanocomposites [21] and 5.7 on TiAlCrN/TiAlCrSiYN multilayers [22].…”

Mechanical behavior of Ti cold spray coatings determined by a multi-scale indentation method

“…Chromik). the indentation size effect as a means to characterize the mechanical properties of materials [8,[14][15][16].…”