2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.123.250604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling Hypothesis for Matrix Product States

Abstract: We revisit the question of describing critical spin systems and field theories using matrix product states, and formulate a scaling hypothesis in terms of operators, eigenvalues of the transfer matrix, and lattice spacing in the case of field theories. Critical exponents and central charge are determined by optimizing the exponents such as to obtain a data collapse. We benchmark this method by studying critical Ising and Potts models, where we also obtain a scaling ansatz for the correlation length and entangl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will start here the analysis of its numerical performance using as benchmark a λφ 4 theory. This theory has been studied with tensor networks techniques which imply the discretization of the field variables in [26,35,36,40,43] and with continuous tensor networks techniques in [52,53].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will start here the analysis of its numerical performance using as benchmark a λφ 4 theory. This theory has been studied with tensor networks techniques which imply the discretization of the field variables in [26,35,36,40,43] and with continuous tensor networks techniques in [52,53].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dimensions [21,26,28,34,43], most of the tensor network effort has so far been invested in QFTs in (1+1) dimensions, and in particular the λφ 4 model [8,9,17,18,20,22,24] and the Schwinger model, i.e. (1+1)-dimensional quantum electrodynamics, (as well as nonabelian generalizations thereof) [19, 23, 25, 27, 29-31, 33, 35-39, 41, 44].…”
Section: Jhep07(2021)207mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to refs. [17,96] and use these techniques to extrapolate reported mass values to the infinite bond dimension limit.…”
Section: Jhep07(2021)207mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MPS case underlies the very successful density matrix renormalization group algorithm [2,3], and its success for simulating critical systems stems from the fact that the finite bond dimension χ approximation plays the role of an infrared (IR) cutoff by effectively adding a small relevant perturbation to the critical system with an amplitude monotonically decreasing as a function of χ . This allows us to construct a theory of finite entanglement scaling for uniform (infinite) MPSs in a vein similar to finite length scaling methods used in exact diagonalization or Monte Carlo [4][5][6][7][8]. Alternatively, matrix product operators (MPOs) have been proven to provide a faithful approximation of thermal states of quantum spin chain Hamiltonians at any finite temperature, with a bond dimension scaling as a power of the inverse temperature, thereby providing an avenue for finite temperature scaling [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%