2007
DOI: 10.5194/bg-4-597-2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling net ecosystem production and net biome production over a heterogeneous region in the western United States

Abstract: Abstract. Bottom-up scaling of net ecosystem production (NEP) and net biome production (NBP) was used to generate a carbon budget for a large heterogeneous region (the state of Oregon, 2.5×10 5 km 2 ) in the western United States. Landsat resolution (30 m) remote sensing provided the basis for mapping land cover and disturbance history, thus allowing us to account for all major fire and logging events over the last 30 years. For NEP, a 23-year record of distributed meteorology (1 km resolution) at the daily t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regional total NPP for forests is 57.6 Tg C yr −1 , a value very close to the observed total of 58.2 × 6.5 Tg C yr −1 calculated from inventory data . The regional modeled total NEP for 2001-2006 is also close to the reported value from inventory data (12.8 versus 15.2 ± 1.6 Tg C yr −1 ; , and Biome-BGC modeled results (17.0 ± 10 Tg C yr −1 ; Turner et al, 2007), but lower than uncertainty of an inverse modeling estimate (35.4 Tg ± 11 Tg C yr −1 ; Göeckede et al, 2010).…”
Section: Modeled Results and Regional Totalssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The regional total NPP for forests is 57.6 Tg C yr −1 , a value very close to the observed total of 58.2 × 6.5 Tg C yr −1 calculated from inventory data . The regional modeled total NEP for 2001-2006 is also close to the reported value from inventory data (12.8 versus 15.2 ± 1.6 Tg C yr −1 ; , and Biome-BGC modeled results (17.0 ± 10 Tg C yr −1 ; Turner et al, 2007), but lower than uncertainty of an inverse modeling estimate (35.4 Tg ± 11 Tg C yr −1 ; Göeckede et al, 2010).…”
Section: Modeled Results and Regional Totalssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Stem biomass density is affected by removal rates through fire and harvest. The regional input harvest rates in current decades match very closely with current estimates (Turner et al, 2007), but the spatial variation varies with overestimates in the West Cascades and Klamath Mountains, which could be contributing to underestimation of stem biomass overtime. Correcting the historical rates in the input file would require thorough review of historical records and is beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: T W Hudiburg Et Al: Evaluation and Improvement Of The Comsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus a variety of observational datasets may be used for model calibration and validation (Wang et al., 2009), and the modelling framework allows for numerical experiments that facilitate examining the mechanisms and uncertainties associated with the simulated stocks and fluxes over daily to seasonal and interannual timescales. Notable in terms of validation is that in areas covered by forest inventory programs, bottom‐up estimates of carbon stocks and changes in stocks can be compared to aggregated inventory data (Turner et al., 2007). Opportunities for evaluation of simulated wall‐to‐wall carbon fluxes, including croplands and other non‐forest ecosystems, over a regional domain are more limited because monitoring programs in non‐forest cover types are less developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%