2013
DOI: 10.1644/12-mamm-a-282.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling of antler size in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): sexual dimorphism and variability in resource allocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicated that males had significantly larger bone elements than females. This can be explained in particular by a strong sexual dimorphism in reindeer (Klein 1970 ; Reimers et al 1983 ; Weinstock 2000 ; Puputti and Niskanen 2009 ; Melnycky et al 2013 ). This difference was also significant within both subspecies, where male R.t. fennicus were the largest, female R.t. tarandus were the smallest and finally male R.t. tarandus were slightly larger than female R.t. fennicus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicated that males had significantly larger bone elements than females. This can be explained in particular by a strong sexual dimorphism in reindeer (Klein 1970 ; Reimers et al 1983 ; Weinstock 2000 ; Puputti and Niskanen 2009 ; Melnycky et al 2013 ). This difference was also significant within both subspecies, where male R.t. fennicus were the largest, female R.t. tarandus were the smallest and finally male R.t. tarandus were slightly larger than female R.t. fennicus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females may also be responsible for this disturbance. Given that adult females are almost as big as young males (Melnycky et al 2013), they are more likely to resist herding behaviours when performed by young males rather than by adult males. Regular chases of young males by female reindeer have, indeed, been reported (Kojola and Nieminen 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luxurious and decorative structures are usually regarded as weapons or ornaments and are vital features in sexual selection, including feathers, antlers, pebbles, horns, jaws, etc ( Uy and Borgia, 2000 ; Melnycky et al., 2013 ; Emlen, 2008 ; Emlen et al., 2007 ; McCullough et al., 2014 ). Female mate choice and male-male competition further complicate and beautify male specialized characters ( Johnson et al., 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%