2001
DOI: 10.1109/36.934080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling-up and model inversion methods with narrowband optical indices for chlorophyll content estimation in closed forest canopies with hyperspectral data

Abstract: Abstract-Radiative transfer theory and modeling assumptions were applied at laboratory and field scales in order to study the link between leaf reflectance and transmittance and canopy hyperspectral data for chlorophyll content estimation. This study was focused on 12 sites of Acer saccharum M. perform better than when all single spectral reflectance channels from hyperspectral airborne CASI data are used, and in addition, the effect of shadows and LAI variation are minimized. Estimates of leaf pigment by hype… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
180
2
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 582 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
180
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Once SPAD readings were converted to CC, each individual leaf CC was compared with its corresponding spectral response to establish the CC and spectral characteristics at the leaf level. (ρ734 − ρ747) (ρ715 + ρ720) [65] Photochemical Reflectance Index PRI (ρ531 − ρ570) (ρ531 + ρ570) [66] Transformed Chlorophyll Absorption Ratio Index TCARI 3 × (ρ700 − ρ670) − 0.2 × (ρ700 − ρ550) × ( ρ700 ρ670 ) [67] Modified Chlorophyll Absorption Index mCARI 705 Spectral bands used to compute broad band VIs were: Blue (436-528), green (512-610), red (625-691), and NIR (829-900 nm). Broad band VIs were computed using the Landsat 8 spectral response function available in the Landsat Science website (http://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/).…”
Section: Spad Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once SPAD readings were converted to CC, each individual leaf CC was compared with its corresponding spectral response to establish the CC and spectral characteristics at the leaf level. (ρ734 − ρ747) (ρ715 + ρ720) [65] Photochemical Reflectance Index PRI (ρ531 − ρ570) (ρ531 + ρ570) [66] Transformed Chlorophyll Absorption Ratio Index TCARI 3 × (ρ700 − ρ670) − 0.2 × (ρ700 − ρ550) × ( ρ700 ρ670 ) [67] Modified Chlorophyll Absorption Index mCARI 705 Spectral bands used to compute broad band VIs were: Blue (436-528), green (512-610), red (625-691), and NIR (829-900 nm). Broad band VIs were computed using the Landsat 8 spectral response function available in the Landsat Science website (http://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/).…”
Section: Spad Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore vegetation indices developed with leaf-level relationships must be ''scaled-up'' to test their utility at the crown and canopy level. Vegetation indices can be incorporated into the ''scaling-up'' process for remote sensing by a number of methods (Zarco-Tejada et al 2001). These include direct application of leaf-level relationships between optical indices and leaf properties to the canopy-measured reflectance, often with single-crown delineation (Coops et al 2003a.…”
Section: A Crown-scale Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the approach is sensitive to perturbing factors such as atmospheric conditions, canopy characteristics and differences in viewing or solar position geometry [23,24]. In an attempt to generate more generic relationships, RTM-based dataset simulations have been used to assess for the most sensitive SIs [18,[25][26][27][28][29]. A spectral index can quite often be used as an estimator for a biophysical parameter using a fitting function through the data; usually by simple linear regression, but also exponential, power, logarithmic and polynomial fitting functions, among others, are commonly applied [22,30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%