2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782009005000001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning electron microscopy of the corneal endothelium of ostrich

Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine the endothelial surface morphology and perform a morphometric analysis of the corneal endothelial cells of ostrich (Struthio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
23
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, there was no significant difference between the right and left eyes. There was no difference in relation to endothelial parameters obtained between fellow eyes of the same individual (MORITA, 1985;ANDREW et al, 2001;PIGATTO et al, 2004;PIGATTO et al, 2005b;PIGATTO et al, 2008;PIGATTO et al, 2009;FRANZEN et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, there was no significant difference between the right and left eyes. There was no difference in relation to endothelial parameters obtained between fellow eyes of the same individual (MORITA, 1985;ANDREW et al, 2001;PIGATTO et al, 2004;PIGATTO et al, 2005b;PIGATTO et al, 2008;PIGATTO et al, 2009;FRANZEN et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The high cost of specular microscopes and the difficulty in obtaining good images in injured endothelial areas are common challenges or barriers to the use of this technique (ANDREW et al, 2001;PIGATTO et al, 2005a;SAAD et al, 2008). SEM has been widely used to compare the endothelial ultrastructure of vertebrates and to evaluate the effects of medications, chemicals, or surgical procedures on the endothelium (COLLIN & COLLIN, 1998;PIGATTO et al, 2004;PIGATTO et al, 2005a;PIGATTO et al, 2005b;PIGATTO et al, 2009). Changes in endothelial cell dimensions can occur as a result of processing the cornea for SEM and the data obtained with regard to endothelial cell density cannot be compared with those obtained using specular microscopy (SCHUTTEN & VAN HORN , 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the limitations of specular microscopy, difficulties in obtaining images in corneas with oedema and in capturing images of peripheral regions of the cornea have been mentioned [19]. When the cornea is not transparent, in vitro techniques have been employed for endothelial analysis, achieving good results [11][12][13]16,24]. In the present study, coloration and optical microscopy enabled the analysis, photography and the study of the shape of the endothelium in all regions of the cornea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Specular microscopy, optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are among the most widely used methods for corneal endothelium analysis (MORITA et al, 1994;PIGATTO et al, 2009;ALBUQUERQUE et al, 2015;COYO et al, 2016;FAGANELLO et al, 2016). There is consensus that the preparation of corneas for studies using SEM causes cell retraction by reducing the original cell area and increasing the endothelial cell density (VIRTANEN et al, 1984;FAGANELLO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, SEM has been used to study the ultrastructure of endothelial cells of different species of animals (PIGATTO et al, 2004;PIGATTO et al, 2005a;PIGATTO et al, 2005b;PIGATTO et al, 2009;TAMAYO-ARANGO et al, 2009). Due to the fact that there is no cellular retraction and it can be used in animals and living humans, specular microscopy is considered the gold standard technique for assessing the corneal endothelium in people and animals (MORITA, 1995;ABIB & BARRETO, 2001;PIGATTO et al, 2006;PIGATTO et al, 2008;FRANZEN et al, 2010;BERCHT et al, 2015;ALBUQUERQUE et al, 2015;COYO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%