2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.651027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scatter correction for cone-beam computed tomography using simulated object models

Abstract: Scattered radiation is a major source of artifacts in flat detector based cone-beam computed tomography. In this paper, a novel software-based method for retrospective scatter correction is described and evaluated. The method is based on approximation of the imaged object by a simple geometric model (e.g., a homogeneous water-like ellipsoid) that is estimated from the set of acquired projections. This is achieved by utilizing a numerical optimization procedure to determine the model parameters for which there … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…͑2͒ In a second scenario, we assume that the contribution of scatter can be calculated precisely by other means. [13][14][15] For this case, scatter is corrected in an ideal manner by subtracting the calculated value from the measured intensity. The noise of the scatter, however, is not correctable and still superposes the total intensity.…”
Section: Iiic Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…͑2͒ In a second scenario, we assume that the contribution of scatter can be calculated precisely by other means. [13][14][15] For this case, scatter is corrected in an ideal manner by subtracting the calculated value from the measured intensity. The noise of the scatter, however, is not correctable and still superposes the total intensity.…”
Section: Iiic Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A somewhat related analytical model (Yao and Leszczynski 2009) separates the scatter distribution into object-dependent terms that are captured by the primary intensity, and terms which are independent of the object and thus can be pre-computed; primary is iteratively estimated from measured projection using this model. Other possible analytical approaches involve approximating the object by a simple ellipsoid, for which scatter can be either pre-computed or estimated at relatively low cost using MC simulations (Bertram et al 2006), a hybrid method combining this approach with scatter kernels (Meyer et al 2010), and algorithms utilising calibration scans to establish relationships between scatter properties of typical objects (e.g. spatial distribution of scatter-to-primary ratio) and some basic parameters accessible in projection images or raw reconstructions (e.g.…”
Section: X-ray Scattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentially interesting are methods to accurately model effects of object non-uniformity on scatter re-projection S nu when low noise scatter projections of uniform objects S u are already known or can be calculated quickly and accurately with e.g. the above mentioned analytical methods (Li et al 2008, Maltz et al 2008, Sun and Star-Lack 2010, Bertram et al 2006). Using Correlated Monte Carlo methods (Spanier and Gelbard 1969), such a scatter estimate can then be rapidly transformed to the scatter projection of a non-uniform object by scaling it with a ratio of MC simulations of the non-uniform object SMCnu and the uniform object SMCu, both obtained with only a very low number photon tracks ( Snu=Su×SMCnu/SMCu), but in which correlated noise partly cancels out during division, as has been shown for SPECT scatter modelling (Beekman et al 1999).…”
Section: X-ray Scattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different method is based on calculations of a single scatter process generalized to fit multiple scatter processes by an adjustment factor 3 . Other works related to cone-beam CT using flat panel detectors are reported [4][5][6][7] . Hardware solution, achieved by implementing a 2D anti-scatter grid, that reduces the scattering in both the fan beam and the longitudinal directions, is recently reported 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%