2000
DOI: 10.1137/s0036139999356107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering in the Presence of Fold Caustics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, analysis of wavefront sets can determine whether backprojection will provide an image free of certain artifacts. 16,21,34 In addition, wavefront-set analysis suggests an approach for producing artifact-free, superresolved images: remove all components of the data set except those that correspond to well-understood target features, and form an image from those components only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, analysis of wavefront sets can determine whether backprojection will provide an image free of certain artifacts. 16,21,34 In addition, wavefront-set analysis suggests an approach for producing artifact-free, superresolved images: remove all components of the data set except those that correspond to well-understood target features, and form an image from those components only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then establish a composition calculus for general FIOs associated with similar canonical relations, which we call folded cross caps, sufficient for identifying the normal operator F * F . In contrast to the case of a single source experiment, treated by Nolan [25] and Felea[5], the resulting artifact is 1 2 order smoother than the main pseudodifferential part of F * F . …”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The assumption (ii) ensures that F is an FIO ( [15], [18], [29], [28]) and (i) ensures that the composition F * F makes sense. In the case of the single source model, with only fold caustics appearing, Nolan [25] showed that F is an FIO associated to a folding canonical relation in the sense of [21] (also called a two-sided fold), and stated that the Schwartz kernel of the operator F * F belongs to a class of distributions associated to two cleanly intersecting Lagrangians in (T * Y \ 0) × (T * Y \ 0). This was fully proved in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations