2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.2063000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scatterometer Sensitivity for Statistical Process Control: Importance of Modeling for In-direct Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the accuracy of the scatterometry measurement is highly dependent on the optical model of the film stack [10]. For this work, the construction of the scatterometer model required multiple iterations of the structure parameters (CD, sidewall angle, film thicknesses, film optical constants) to determine the library ranges for the final model.…”
Section: Procedures and Apperatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the accuracy of the scatterometry measurement is highly dependent on the optical model of the film stack [10]. For this work, the construction of the scatterometer model required multiple iterations of the structure parameters (CD, sidewall angle, film thicknesses, film optical constants) to determine the library ranges for the final model.…”
Section: Procedures and Apperatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fast MAM times are a natural advantage for inline measurements, especially relative to the profilometer method. However, complex film stacks can be challenging for the scatterometer because of the required film information necessary for model development [10]. The goal of the current study is to assess whether a scatterometer model can be developed with sufficient fidelity to replace the profilometer for height measurements of FRAM test structures and capacitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%