2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-3287(02)00002-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenario building for Metropolitan Tunis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this workshop, the above participants took part in a structured discussion, organized by the authors of the present planning study. The whole event was structured according to the future workshop qualitative participatory approach, running in four discrete stages, namely the [5]:…”
Section: The Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this workshop, the above participants took part in a structured discussion, organized by the authors of the present planning study. The whole event was structured according to the future workshop qualitative participatory approach, running in four discrete stages, namely the [5]:…”
Section: The Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Celino i Concilio (2010) opisuju izradu scenarija u sklopu izrade socijalnog i ekonomskog plana regionalnog parka koji obuhvaća deltu rijeke Po (Veneto), gdje su scenariji zamišljeni kao alati assure the continuous engagement of multiple factors, given that the actors who construct scenarios are the same as the ones who implement ideas, make decisions and take actions. However, as shown by the experience of Barbanente et al (2002) in scenario construction in Tunis, the selection and involvement of key stakeholders in the process can be very difficult, either because of indifference on the part of the stakeholders towards the goals of the project or uncertainty about its usefulness, the unfamiliar approach that was used, the fact that many would-be participants were unaccustomed to participatory procedures, and especially the reluctance of stakeholders to reveal their opinions on delicate issues. In accordance with this, Rotmans et al (2000) notice the increasing importance of participation does not mean it is easy actually to include stakeholders.…”
Section: Scenariji Prema Tipovimamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that scenario building is 'an essential element for working on, and creating, alternative futures' and 'an important part of socio-economic analysis' [63]. Such approaches to futures thinking are well established in practitioner and policy communities [61] and have been used with reference to a broad range of issues and phenomena, including: the global economy [64]; community development [4]; urban planning [3]; technology forecasting [6]; the development of information and communication technology [69] economic sectors [49,14]; and geopolitical issues [28]. The potential value of futures thinking has been recognised by policy-makers and can be seen in aspects of policy-making [18].…”
Section: Why Consider Small Business Futures?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many established scenarios development methods use groups, typically of peers or experts, to identify future possibilities and their drivers and to generate and assess scenarios [60,63,61,4,3,30]. Such methodologies bring together and synthesise multiple views and perspectives based on the personal, and hence subjective, opinions and judgements of those involved [42].…”
Section: Policy Aspirations and Counterfactual Thinking As A Means Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%