Tsunami Science Four Years After the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami 2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0346-0057-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scenarios of Earthquake-Generated Tsunamis for the Italian Coast of the Adriatic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They find a low tsunami hazard in the northern Adriatic, increasing toward the south, though in most places only waves smaller than 1 m are expected. In the present study we find larger tsunami hazard along the southern Italian Adriatic coast than what is found by Tiberti et al [2008], most likely because that study does not consider tsunamis generated in the eastern Hellenic Arc, which is expected to be an important contributor to the tsunami hazard in that region. For the Marmara Sea, Hébert et al [2005] have studied a number of earthquake scenarios with magnitudes up to 7.6 along the North Anatolian Fault.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They find a low tsunami hazard in the northern Adriatic, increasing toward the south, though in most places only waves smaller than 1 m are expected. In the present study we find larger tsunami hazard along the southern Italian Adriatic coast than what is found by Tiberti et al [2008], most likely because that study does not consider tsunamis generated in the eastern Hellenic Arc, which is expected to be an important contributor to the tsunami hazard in that region. For the Marmara Sea, Hébert et al [2005] have studied a number of earthquake scenarios with magnitudes up to 7.6 along the North Anatolian Fault.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…We find an annual probability of exceeding 1 m PCTA in Messina of 0.007, which indicates a higher hazard level than that found by Tinti et al [2005]. Tiberti et al [2008] study the tsunami hazard along the Italian Adriatic coastline through scenarios of tsunamis generated by most credible earthquakes in six source zones. They find a low tsunami hazard in the northern Adriatic, increasing toward the south, though in most places only waves smaller than 1 m are expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…In addition to these maps we have performed an approximation to the threat based on a classification of the levels of damage expected as a function of the wave height. We have followed the levels proposed by Tiberti et al (2008), which follow a three color coded classification similar to the one used by the "j apan Meteorological Agency" (http:// www.jrna.go.jp/en/tsunarni/). These levels classified the wave eleva tion in 0.5 m steps, dividing the threat as "Marine Threat" for maximum wave elevations between 0.05 m and 0.5 m; "Land Threat" for the range 0.5 m to 1 m; and "Severe Land Threat" for maximum wave elevations over 1 m. We have used the -1 0 m contour line from the bathymetry to obtain the expected maximum wave elevation in front of the coast.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This bears important consequences in applications that require individual fault ruptures; the INGV sources must be split into sections of appropriate dimension consistent with the assigned earthquake magnitude. Examples on how this can be done are given in , Tiberti et al (2008), and Rotondi (2010).…”
Section: Seismogenic Source Behaviormentioning
confidence: 98%