2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2013.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scene-based non-uniformity correction: From algorithm to implementation on a smart camera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several techniques are reported in the literature to correct the image through NUC techniques. These techniques can be broadly classified into: (i) Blackbody calibration method based 4,5 (ii) Scene information based 6,7,8 .…”
Section: Basic Operation Of Non Uniformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques are reported in the literature to correct the image through NUC techniques. These techniques can be broadly classified into: (i) Blackbody calibration method based 4,5 (ii) Scene information based 6,7,8 .…”
Section: Basic Operation Of Non Uniformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete architecture can process up to 100 fps on frames of 320 Â 240 pixels using around 38% of the logic resources of the FPGA, and consumes 832 mW. Toczek developed a hardware implementation of an improved version of the constant statistics algorithm [24]. This method compensated the offset by removing the spatial low frequencies of each frame before applying the constant statistics technique, and then added the low frequencies to the final image.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During postprocessing, dark frames were subtracted from the corresponding images-of-interest to reduce fixed-pattern noise (FPN) and as a replacement for the non-uniformity correction (NUC) [11]. The effectiveness of this technique was guaranteed as long as measurement frames and dark frames were taken in close succession [12]. To reduce detector noise, depending upon the data set, each recorded image consisted of the average of 180-500 Manipulation of a detector's dynamic range via the choice of IT.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%