Scene-based spectral calibration for thermal infrared hyperspectral data

Feng, 谢锋 Xie; Chengyu, 刘成玉 Liu; Honglan, 邵红兰 Shao; Changxing, 张长兴 Zhang; Gui, 杨贵 Yang; Jianyu, 王建宇 Wang

doi:10.3788/irla201746.0138001

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From the analyses above, it can be concluded that the center wavelength shift has a greater effect on the inversion errors, but the FWHM change has little effect on the inversion errors. Generally, the center wavelength shift can be corrected by the scene-based spectral calibration algorithm using the atmospheric absorption channel as a reference, and the minimum error is less than 1 nm under the influence of atmospheric conditions (such as atmospheric water vapor content) [40]. Here we assume that the scene-based spectral shift correction error is less than 0.05 band and analyze the characteristics of LST and LSE inversion errors after the spectral shift is corrected.…”

Section: Simulated Data and Tes Methods Error Fitting Function Rmsementioning

confidence: 99%

Temperature and Emissivity Inversion Accuracy of Spectral Parameter Changes and Noise of Hyperspectral Thermal Infrared Imaging Spectrometers

Shao

Liu

et al. 2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emergence of hyperspectral thermal infrared imaging spectrometers makes it possible to retrieve both the land surface temperature (LST) and the land surface emissivity (LSE) simultaneously. However, few articles focus on the problem of how the instrument’s spectral parameters and instrument noise level affect the LST and LSE inversion errors. In terms of instrument development, this article simulated three groups of hyperspectral thermal infrared data with three common spectral parameters and each group of data includes tens of millions of simulated radiances of 1525 emissivity curves with 17 center wavelength shift ratios, 6 full width at half maximum (FWHM) change ratios and 6 noise equivalent differential temperatures (NEDTs) under 15 atmospheric conditions with 6 object temperatures, inverted them by two temperature and emissivity separation methods (ISSTES and ARTEMISS), and analyzed quantitatively the effects of the spectral parameters change and noise of an instrument on the LST and LSE inversion errors. The results show that: (1) center wavelength shifts and noise affect the inversion errors strongly, while FWHM changes affect them weakly; (2) the LST and LSE inversion errors increase with the center wavelength shift ratio in a quadratic function and increase with FWHM change ratio slowly and linearly for both the inversion methods, however they increase with NEDT in an S-curve for ISSTES while they increase with NEDT slightly and linearly for ARTEMISS. During the design and development of a hyperspectral thermal infrared instrument, it is highly recommended to keep the potential center wavelength shift within 1 band and keep NEDT within 0.1K (corresponding LST error < 1K and LSE error < 0.015) for normal applications and within 0.03K (corresponding LST error < 0.5K and LSE error < 0.01) for better application effect and level.

show abstract

Section: Simulated Data and Tes Methods Error Fitting Function Rmsementioning

confidence: 99%

Temperature and Emissivity Inversion Accuracy of Spectral Parameter Changes and Noise of Hyperspectral Thermal Infrared Imaging Spectrometers

Shao

Liu

et al. 2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The systematic errors can be reduced or removed by some correction methods based on the study of error patterns. For example, besides laboratory calibration, scene-based spectral calibration is able to improve further the spectral calibration accuracy of the field-measured data, which selects some atmospheric absorption channels as the reference channel to perform spectral calibration on the measured data, and the minimum error of the center wavelength shift is within 1 nm [49]. The sensor altitude, spectral range and resolution depend on the equipment development level and the external conditions during data acquisition.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Noise-sensitivity Analysis and Improvement of Automatic Retrieval of Temperature and Emissivity Using Spectral Smoothness

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are numerous algorithms that can be used to retrieve land surface temperature (LST) and land surface emissivity (LSE) from hyperspectral thermal infrared (HTIR) data. The algorithms are sensitive to a number of factors, where noise is difficult to handle due to its unpredictability. Although there is a lot of research regarding the influence of noise on retrieval errors, few studies have focused on the mechanism. In this study, we selected the automatic retrieval of temperature and emissivity using spectral smoothness (ARTEMISS) algorithm—the representative of the iterative spectral smoothness temperature-emissivity separation algorithm family—as the research object and proposed an improved algorithm. First, we analyzed the influence mechanism of noise on the retrieval errors of ARTEMISS in theory. Second, we carried out a simulation and inversion experiment and analyzed the relationship between instrument spectral resolution, noise level, the ARTEMISS parameter setting and the retrieval errors separately. Last, we proposed an improved method (resolution-degrade-based spectral smoothness algorithm, RDSS) based on the mechanism and law of the influence of noise on retrieval errors and provided corresponding suggestions on instrument design. The results show that RDSS improves the accuracy of temperature inversion and is more effective for thermal infrared data with a high noise level and high spectral resolution, which can reduce the LST inversion error by up to 0.75 K and the LSE median absolute deviation (MAD) by 31%. In the presence of noise in HTIR data, the RDSS algorithm performs better than the ARTEMISS algorithm in terms of temperature-emissivity separation.

show abstract

Scene-based spectral calibration for thermal infrared hyperspectral data

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Temperature and Emissivity Inversion Accuracy of Spectral Parameter Changes and Noise of Hyperspectral Thermal Infrared Imaging Spectrometers

Temperature and Emissivity Inversion Accuracy of Spectral Parameter Changes and Noise of Hyperspectral Thermal Infrared Imaging Spectrometers

Noise-sensitivity Analysis and Improvement of Automatic Retrieval of Temperature and Emissivity Using Spectral Smoothness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About