2003
DOI: 10.1007/10968987_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling of Parallel Jobs in a Heterogeneous Multi-site Environment

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
35
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…-Min-Completion-Time (MCT). In contrast to MLB, the earliest possible completion time is determined based on a partial schedule of already assigned jobs [9,7]. For instance, Moab [3] can estimate the completion time of all jobs in the local queue because jobs and reservations possess a start time and a wallclock limit.…”
Section: Two Level Hierarchy Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Min-Completion-Time (MCT). In contrast to MLB, the earliest possible completion time is determined based on a partial schedule of already assigned jobs [9,7]. For instance, Moab [3] can estimate the completion time of all jobs in the local queue because jobs and reservations possess a start time and a wallclock limit.…”
Section: Two Level Hierarchy Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K-Distributed and K-Dual Queue Models [15,21] propose a distributed scheduling algorithm which redundantly distributes jobs to different sites simultaneously, instead of only sending jobs to the most lightly loaded sites. The K-Distributed model enables each metascheduler of each site to distribute their jobs to the K least loaded sites, whereby such jobs will be scheduled by all K sites respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a large body [1,2,3,4,5] of research focused on the performance of job schedulers for parallel machines, much of it being reported at the annual Workshop on Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing [6]. These studies have generally focused on user metrics (such as turnaround time and slowdown) and system metrics (such as utilization and loss of capacity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%