2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00175-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling problems with a learning effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
114
0
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
114
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Similar to Mosheiov [13], for the next three problems, we show that the optimal schedule of the classical version is not optimal for the problems 1|LE t | w j C j , 1|LE t |L max and 1|LE t | U j , respectively.…”
Section: Several Single Machine Scheduling Problemssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Similar to Mosheiov [13], for the next three problems, we show that the optimal schedule of the classical version is not optimal for the problems 1|LE t | w j C j , 1|LE t |L max and 1|LE t | U j , respectively.…”
Section: Several Single Machine Scheduling Problemssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…They also proposed two heuristics and analysed their worstcase performance. Mosheiov [13,14] investigated several other single machine problems and the minimum total flow time problem on identical parallel machines. Liu et al [11] proved that the weighted shortest processing time (WSPT) rule, the earliest due date (EDD) rule and the modified Moore-Hodgson algorithm can construct optimal sequences under certain conditions for the following three objectives: the total weighted completion time, the maximum lateness and the number of tardy jobs, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier papers, the focus has been on particular functions that define the positional factors g(r), e.g., polynomial [23,24] or exponential [25]. In what follows, it is assumed that the values g(r), 1 ≤ r ≤ n, are either given as an array of numbers or g(r) can be computed for each r in constant time.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation [9], [20] is the most usual tool to produce such an aggregation, as it will be pointed out in section 4.2. Some articles go even further by formalising the mechanisms of performance evolution: individual learning mechanisms have for instance an impact on medium and long term temporal performances [21], [22].…”
Section: Causal Models: Impact Of Competencies On the Performance Of mentioning
confidence: 99%