2019
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1621222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling with regular performance measures and optional job rejection on a single machine

Abstract: We address single machine problems with optional job-rejection, studied recently in Zhang et al. [21] and Cao et al. [2]. In these papers, the authors focus on minimizing regular performance measures, i.e., functions that are non-decreasing in the jobs completion time, subject to the constraint that the total rejection cost cannot exceed a predefined upper bound. They also prove that the considered problems are ordinary NP-hard and provide pseudo-polynomial-time Dynamic Programming (DP) solutions. In this pape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, He et al [10] and Ou et al [11] independently designed an improved approximation algorithm with a running time of O(n log n). More related results can be found in the surveys [12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Recently, He et al [10] and Ou et al [11] independently designed an improved approximation algorithm with a running time of O(n log n). More related results can be found in the surveys [12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It follows that when the option of job-rejection is valid, the scheduler may decide to process only a subset of the jobs, and those jobs which are not processed (i.e., totally rejected or outsourced) are penalized. The importance and practicality of job-rejection are demonstrated in the following selection of recently published papers, addressing various machine settings and cost functions: Zou and Miao (2016), Gerstl and Mosheiov (2017), Strusevich (2017), Fiszman and, Huang et al (2018), Mor and Mosheiov (2018), Zhang et al (2018), Dabiri et al (2019, Kovalyov et al (2019), Mor and Shapira (2019), Koulamas, and Kyparisis (2020), , Mor and Shapira (2020a, b), , Mosheiov and Pruwer (2020) and Wang et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%