1984
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1984.10542861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schizophrenics' and College Students' Preference for and Judgment of Schizophrenic Versus Normal Humorous Captions

Abstract: The present study investigated schizophrenics' and college students' preference for and judgment of humor samples written by schizophrenics and normals. Twenty male hospitalized schizophrenics and 20 male undergraduate college students ranked from most to least funny two sets of captions that had been previously written by an independent group of 10 college students and 10 schizophrenics. In addition, all subjects identified which captions they thought were written by college students and which by schizophreni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our present observations, that is, that metaphor explanation (picture metaphor explanation and written metaphor explanation) and effectiveness of communication are impaired in the converter group, are difficult to compare with those of relevant studies; nevertheless, they remain in line with observations of UHR individuals, patients with first‐episode schizophrenia (FE) (Pawełczyk et al, 2017), and people with schizophrenia with longer duration of the illness (Docherty, Hall, & Gordinier, 1998; Kuperberg, 2010a; Kuperberg, 2010b; Kuperberg et al, 1998; Pawelczyk et al, 2019; Pawełczyk et al, 2017). Also, the humour comprehension disturbances observed in UHR participants are consistent with those seen in people with schizophrenia (Corcoran et al, 1997; Pawelczyk et al, 2019; Rosin & Cerbus, 1984). These consistent results might reflect the neurodevelopmental nature of schizophrenia (Weinberger, 2017) since they show the presence of some pragmatic disturbances both at the time when no symptoms of schizophrenia are apparent and later, when the psychosis is fully developed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our present observations, that is, that metaphor explanation (picture metaphor explanation and written metaphor explanation) and effectiveness of communication are impaired in the converter group, are difficult to compare with those of relevant studies; nevertheless, they remain in line with observations of UHR individuals, patients with first‐episode schizophrenia (FE) (Pawełczyk et al, 2017), and people with schizophrenia with longer duration of the illness (Docherty, Hall, & Gordinier, 1998; Kuperberg, 2010a; Kuperberg, 2010b; Kuperberg et al, 1998; Pawelczyk et al, 2019; Pawełczyk et al, 2017). Also, the humour comprehension disturbances observed in UHR participants are consistent with those seen in people with schizophrenia (Corcoran et al, 1997; Pawelczyk et al, 2019; Rosin & Cerbus, 1984). These consistent results might reflect the neurodevelopmental nature of schizophrenia (Weinberger, 2017) since they show the presence of some pragmatic disturbances both at the time when no symptoms of schizophrenia are apparent and later, when the psychosis is fully developed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Previous studies have implied that higher level language functions such as metaphor processing and discourse comprehension are disturbed in people with schizophrenia (Kuperberg, 2010a; Kuperberg, 2010b; Pawelczyk et al, 2019; Pawełczyk et al, 2017). What is more, they have been found to be more likely to demonstrate impairments in processing indirect speech acts, to have a distorted sense of humour (Corcoran, Cahill, & Frith, 1997; Rosin & Cerbus, 1984) and display an inability to appreciate irony (Drury, Robinson, & Birchwood, 1998). Other studies imply the presence of discourse deficits in people with schizophrenia (Andreasen, Arndt, Alliger, Miller, & Flaum, 1995; McKenna & Oh, 2005), a lack of cohesion in samples of patient speech (Noel‐Jorand, Reinert, Giudicelli, & Dassa, 1997), lowered sensitivity to linguistic violations (Kuperberg, McGuire, & David, 1998) and a higher number of errors in decoding communicative intent (Tenyi, Herold, Szili, & Trixler, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Of note, whereas active psychotic symptoms have been found to have a definite role in deficits in these areas, a significant part of the impairment does not depend on symptoms but is considered to constitute a trait inherent to the disease. 12,13 An additional source of evidence underscoring linguistic functions of the nondominant hemisphere comes from patients with "disconnection syndromes," either with sections or agenesia of the corpus callosum. These studies suggest that left hemispheric structures involved in language comprehension and production necessitate input from the nondominant hemisphere to appropriately and accurately label emotions.…”
Section: Linguistic Functions Of the Nondominant Hemispherementioning
confidence: 98%
“…What is more, other studies suggest that schizophrenia patients are more likely to have impairments in processing indirect speech acts, which hampers their inference of the intent of a speaker from indirect requests (Corcoran, 2003), impedes their understanding of indirect information (Corcoran, 2003) and complicates story comprehension (Langdnon, Davies, & Coltheart, 2002). What is more, a distorted sense of humour (Corcoran, Cahill, & Frith, 1997;Rosin & Cerbus, 1984) and inability to appreciate irony (Drury, Robinson, & Birchwood, 1998) have also been described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%