2009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1627161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schlaganfallprävention aus praktisch klinischer Sicht

Abstract: ZusammenfassungDer Arzt steht oft vor dem Problem, dass er weiß, was die Leitlinien der DGN zur Sekundärprophylaxe des Schlaganfalles sagen. Nur muss der Arzt einen Patienten, den er z. B. nie in eine Studie hätte aufnehmen können, behandeln. Hierzu bedarf es eines Pragmatismus, der die Kosten für das System, aber vor allem die individuelle Situation des Patienten berücksichtigen muss. Hinzu kommt, dass Studien Fragen offen lassen. Für die Wahl des Aggregationshemmers ist die individuelle Situation des Patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) ⇒ (i). This implication is based upon the well-known result that a locally compact topological space is paracompact if and only if it is the direct sum of locally and σ-compact topological spaces (cf., for instance, Grotemeyer [23], Satz 97). In order to prove the validity of assertion (i) it, therefore, suffices to show that (X, t) must be the direct sum of countably many locally and σ-compact topological spaces.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) ⇒ (i). This implication is based upon the well-known result that a locally compact topological space is paracompact if and only if it is the direct sum of locally and σ-compact topological spaces (cf., for instance, Grotemeyer [23], Satz 97). In order to prove the validity of assertion (i) it, therefore, suffices to show that (X, t) must be the direct sum of countably many locally and σ-compact topological spaces.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%