Scholarly Publication, Early-Career Scholars, and Reflectivity

Habibie, Pejman; Burgess, Sally

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85784-4_1

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, they are required to produce works in journals with high impact routinely and have an ORCID number. The reality is that for academic staff at higher institutions, writing for scientific publications remains a challenge and a significant difficulty (Tella & Onyancha, 2020;Habibie, 2015). When academics are putting up papers for publications that are indexed by Scopus or Web of Science (WoS), these difficulties become more glaring.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of a research training workshop for academic staff in tertiary institutions: A Kirkpatrick model approach

2024

JALT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academic staff; staff in tertiary institutions. The study's population consists of academic staff in tertiary institutions in Delta State, Nigeria. The sample comprised 59 academic staff who participated voluntarily in the workshop. Through a pre-questionnaire, a post-questionnaire, a participant satisfaction level questionnaire, and interviews, the four stages of the Kirkpatrick Model were used to assess the effectiveness of the workshop.High levels of participant satisfaction and notable advancements in academic writing, publication, and research exposure were observed as a result of the workshop. As they established online research profiles, identified predatory journals, and improved paper preparation, participants actively were able to apply their newly gained abilities. A 12-month post-workshop evaluation found remarkable results, including 18 participants publishing articles in journals with a Scopus index and many more creating profiles on Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and Academic.edu. The study highlights the significance of customised workshops in advancing research abilities and academic recognition by demonstrating a favourable association between customised workshops and increased research capabilities. Future evaluations can use the evaluation model as a useful framework, allowing for well-informed judgments about institutional and educational improvements.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of a research training workshop for academic staff in tertiary institutions: A Kirkpatrick model approach

2024

JALT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Scholarly Publication, Early-Career Scholars, and Reflectivity

Cited by 1 publication

References 29 publications

Evaluation of a research training workshop for academic staff in tertiary institutions: A Kirkpatrick model approach

Evaluation of a research training workshop for academic staff in tertiary institutions: A Kirkpatrick model approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About