Motricidade 2021
DOI: 10.6063/motricidade.24557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School-based swimming lessons enhance specific skills and motor coordination in children: the comparison between two interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Swimming lessons’ importance has increased worldwide regarding children’s recreational activities [ 35 , 36 ]. Additionally, swimming allows for the promotion of age-appropriate motor and physical experiences contributing to the children’s development [ 37 ]. Furthermore, the physical and physiological effects of swimming may also contribute to developing motor performance skills [ 38 ] and efficient movement patterns, leading to overall motor advancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swimming lessons’ importance has increased worldwide regarding children’s recreational activities [ 35 , 36 ]. Additionally, swimming allows for the promotion of age-appropriate motor and physical experiences contributing to the children’s development [ 37 ]. Furthermore, the physical and physiological effects of swimming may also contribute to developing motor performance skills [ 38 ] and efficient movement patterns, leading to overall motor advancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the final 10 studies, only 2 originated in the UK [ 7 , 10 ]. The remaining eight originated from various countries, including Portugal [ 8 , 9 , 48 ], Serbia [ 6 , 45 ], Romania [ 47 ], Poland [ 46 ], and Turkey [ 5 ]. All studies reported gender and age as required by the inclusion/exclusion criteria; participants of the studies were predominantly male: out of a combined total of 611 participants from all studies, 429 (70.2%) were male, and only 182 (29.8%) were female.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pratt et al [ 10 ] identified a significant ( p < 0.05) gender difference in that females had a higher AMP score (27.97 ± 27.90) compared to males (21.10 ± 22.70), which highlighted the potential need for a standardised assessment battery for swimming to further explore these effects. In addition, several papers did not use control groups (CG) [ 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 47 ], whereas studies that did include a CG [ 7 , 45 , 46 , 48 ] found significant results between them, further supporting the need for a robust swimming intervention within the curriculum, for FMS development alongside social, PA, and health benefits. There was no study included in this cohort that identified that swimming did not improve FMS development.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations