“…Without a shift within the US curriculum debate called the 'reconceptualist movement', with its attempt to 'understand, not just implement or evaluate, the curriculum' (Pinar, 1999: xiv), connecting to other parts of the world would have been difficult, whereby the quest to 'understand' was directed towards an understanding of a cultural construction that includes particular visions of the child, the (ideal) social order and the (ideal) citizens. Due in particular to its international focus, the 'reconceptualist' discussion was less engaged in advocating and more engaged in critical analysis of curriculum (Apple, 1979;Popkewitz, 1991Popkewitz, , 2009Popkewitz, , 2013Popkewitz et al, 2001;Pinar, 2006Pinar, , 2014Tröhler et al, 2011). This current international analytical-critical movement in curriculum research serves as the frame of this article, which deals essentially with two major aspects: the historiographic challenge between the national and the global, and the twopart team of constitution and curriculum.…”