2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4953813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schottky’s conjecture, field emitters, and the point charge model

Abstract: A Point Charge Model of conical field emitters, in which the emitter is defined by an equipotential surface of judiciously placed charges over a planar conductor, is used to confirm Schottky’s conjecture that field enhancement factors are multiplicative for a small protrusion placed on top of a larger base structure. Importantly, it is shown that Schottky’s conjecture for conical / ellipsoidal field emitters remains unexpectedly valid even when the dimensions of the protrusion begin to approach the dimensions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already pointed, this feature has been found analytically in Ref. [15], but for conical field emitters using point charge model.…”
Section: 55supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As already pointed, this feature has been found analytically in Ref. [15], but for conical field emitters using point charge model.…”
Section: 55supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Finally, with the aim to compare our results with those of Refs. [14] and [15], we show in Fig. 5 the behavior of γ C /(γ 1 γ 2 ) as a function of parameter h 2 /r 1 , for specific values of h 1 /r 1 and h 2 /r 2 .…”
Section: 55mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SC became a paradigm of a good approximation in order to explain large FEFs obtained in CFE experiments, nevertheless it is well known that this conjecture is not rigorously true and there is still some lack of theoretical results studying its validity. Previous results suggest that SC is valid when the dimensions of the upper-stage structure are much smaller than the ones from the lower-stage [12,13,18,19]. Furthermore, results using a point charge model suggest that SC remains valid even for some situations in which the two stages have dimensions of the same order of magnitude [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple example consists on a metal single tip field emitter (STFE). Alternatively one could consider a two-stage-structure which, depending on the dimensions of each of the stages, produces a high local field enhancement factor (FEF), as compared with the single-stage case [10][11][12][13]. All these aspects have motivated the development of field emitter designs featuring these properties [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation