The
addition of aldehyde enamines to nitroalkenes affords cyclobutanes
in all solvents, with all of the pyrrolidine and proline derivatives
tested by us and with all of the substrates we have examined. Depending
on the temperature, concentration of water, solvent polarity, and
other factors, the opening and hydrolysis of such a four-membered
ring may take place rapidly or last for several days, producing the
final Michael-like adducts (4-nitrobutanals). Thirteen new cyclobutanes
have now been characterized by NMR spectroscopy. As could be expected,
s-trans-enamine conformers give rise to all-trans-(4S)-4-nitrocyclobutylpyrrolidines,
while s-cis-enamine conformers afford all-trans-(4R)-4-nitrocyclobutylpyrrolidines.
These four-membered rings can isomerize to adduct enamines, which
should be hydrolyzed via their iminium ions. MP2 and M06-2X calculations
predict that one iminium ion is more stable than the other iminium
species, so that protonation of the adduct enamines can be quite stereoselective;
in the presence of water, the so-called syn adducts (e.g., OCH–*CHR–*CHPh–CH2NO2, with R and Ph syn) eventually become the major
products. Why one syn adduct is obtained with aldehydes, whereas cyclic
ketones (the predicted ring-fused cyclobutanes of which isomerize
to their enamines more easily) produce the other syn adduct, is also
explained by means of molecular orbital calculations. Nitro-Michael
reactions of aldehyde enamines that “stop” at the nitrocyclobutane
stage and final enamine stage do not work catalytically, as known,
but those of cyclic ketone enamines that do not work stop at the final
enamine stage (if their hydrolysis to the corresponding nitroethylketones
is less favorable than expected). These and other facts are accounted
for, and the proposals of the groups led by Seebach and Hayashi, Blackmond,
and Pihko and Papai are reconciled.