2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.31.018812
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schrödinger’s phenotypes: herbarium specimens show two-dimensional images are both good and (not so) bad sources of morphological data

Abstract: AbstractMuseum specimens are the main source of information on organisms’ morphological features. Although access to this information was commonly limited to researchers able to visit collections, it is now becoming freely available thanks to the digitization of museum specimens. With these images, we will be able to collectively build large-scale morphological datasets, but these will only be useful if the limits to this app… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Localisation of plant organs will improve automated recognition and measurements of organ-specific traits, by preselecting appropriate training material for these approaches. The general approach of measuring traits from images instead of the specimen itself has been shown to be precise, except for very small objects (Borges et al 2020). Of course, measurements that involve further processing of plant parts, as often done in traditional morphological studies on herbarium specimens, are not possible from images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localisation of plant organs will improve automated recognition and measurements of organ-specific traits, by preselecting appropriate training material for these approaches. The general approach of measuring traits from images instead of the specimen itself has been shown to be precise, except for very small objects (Borges et al 2020). Of course, measurements that involve further processing of plant parts, as often done in traditional morphological studies on herbarium specimens, are not possible from images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and functional trait, phylogenetic, and collector characteristics that must be taken into account when using specimen data and datasets (Meyer et al, 2016;Daru et al, 2018;Cornwell et al, 2019;Nic Lughadha et al, 2019). Moreover, the accuracy of a herbarium's automated image analysis decreases as traits diminish in size, at lower resolution, and if organs overlap (Borges et al, 2020). Phenological determination using machine learning is limited by factors such as damage obscuring certain traits, material being stored in opaque packets and the morphological characteristics of some species (e.g.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the past we could get information only from looking at the physical specimens, our technical and technological ability to extract data from the specimens (e.g. from images (Borges et al, 2020)) makes this virtual information increasingly important. In other words, virtual data will enrich (rather than replace) the information provided by the physical objects themselves, with collections providing the essential first step to a new way of understanding plant diversity, ecology and physiology.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest is biological specimen image collections, given their value as a data source for species identification and morphological study [ 6 , 7 ]. The research presented in this paper addresses this topic in the context of an NSF supported Harnessing the Data Revolution (HDR) project, Biology-Guided Neural Networks for Discovering Phenotypic Traits (BGNN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%