Science communication and the issue of trust

Abstract

Science communication, whether internally or to the general public depends on trust, both trust in the source and trust in the medium of communication. With the new 'ecology of communication' this trust is endangered. On the one hand the very term of science communication has been captured by many different actors (e.g., governments, PR experts, universities and research institutions, science journalists, and bloggers) apart from scientists themselves to whom science communication means different things and whose communication is tainted by special interests. Some of these actors are probably more trusted by the general public than others. On the other hand, the channels that are used to communicate science are also not trusted equally. Particularly the widespread use of social media raises doubts about the credibility of the communication spread through them. AbstractScience and media; Science and policy-making; Science communication: theory and models Keywords

Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists

“…Providing ready-made scientific content to news outlets without charge may perpetuate the media’s reliance on free, external content, and hence contribute to the weakening position of science journalists. It could be argued that accustoming the media to getting ready-made content without journalistic scrutiny may in fact be advancing ‘churnalism’- a practice in which pre-packaged stories provided by news agencies and press releases are adapted for publication instead of reported news, and therefore potentially posing a danger to the legitimacy of science journalism and undermining its credibility (12,13,65).…”

In the footsteps of Einstein, Sagan and Barnard: Identifying South Africa’s most visible scientists

“…10,17 Their concerns are exacerbated by apprehensions about the risks presented by social media. 18 Furthermore, the rise of public relations approaches in institutional science communication 19 has resulted in some criticism of the efforts of some institutions and scientists to gain attention for their work 5 . The inevitable tensions between increasing expectations to engage with public audiences and lingering reservations about the potential consequences of doing so, sustain scientists' ambivalence about public visibility.…”

“…However, in a world where science has become increasingly competitive, contested and politicised 3 , the borders between science and politics are blurring and science is more closely coupled with politics and mass media 4 . As a result, public communication of science has also become a tool to compete for public attention and political support 5 and scientists' motivation to seek public visibility may be complex and diverse.…”

Push or Pull: Recommendations and Alternative Approaches for Public Science Communicators

“…These include fewer science reporters employed by the news media, an "attention economy" that demands more frequent and attractive news, and a diversified media landscape created by the Internet. Scientists themselves are increasingly oriented toward the media as academic performance evaluation encourages being in the spotlight (Dunwoody, 2014;Weingart and Guenther, 2016;Weingart, 2017).…”