2021
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1893857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Science is accessible for everyone’: preservice special education teachers’ nature of science perceptions and instructional practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in the field of science and science education at the higher education level include: both male and female students commonly believed that issues of gender were restricted to the the male‐dominated science disciplines but female students are more persistent in studying science (Fisher et al., 2020); conceptual changes to SSI‐based obesity (Leung & Cheng, 2020); an effective intervention in science class with a taxonomy code (Newton & Zeidler, 2020); motivation to learn physics and chemistry influenced by academic majors (Salta & Koulougliotis, 2020); a study of teacher candidates that showed a lack of consistency, simplicity and completeness in the explanations given to students (Viennot, 2020); student literacy skills that are enhanced by the context of the task and still use a lot of pre‐interpreted texts (Lennox et al., 2020); teacher candidates implementing NOS in inquiry even though NOS is not required (Librea‐carden et al., 2021); content knowledge and social factors influencing students' moral reasoning (Seiter & Fuselier, 2021); and negotiations in scientific arguments producing group consensus (Governor et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in the field of science and science education at the higher education level include: both male and female students commonly believed that issues of gender were restricted to the the male‐dominated science disciplines but female students are more persistent in studying science (Fisher et al., 2020); conceptual changes to SSI‐based obesity (Leung & Cheng, 2020); an effective intervention in science class with a taxonomy code (Newton & Zeidler, 2020); motivation to learn physics and chemistry influenced by academic majors (Salta & Koulougliotis, 2020); a study of teacher candidates that showed a lack of consistency, simplicity and completeness in the explanations given to students (Viennot, 2020); student literacy skills that are enhanced by the context of the task and still use a lot of pre‐interpreted texts (Lennox et al., 2020); teacher candidates implementing NOS in inquiry even though NOS is not required (Librea‐carden et al., 2021); content knowledge and social factors influencing students' moral reasoning (Seiter & Fuselier, 2021); and negotiations in scientific arguments producing group consensus (Governor et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elementary teachers may also be tasked with the challenge of implementing NGSS-aligned STEM + CS curricula in inclusive classrooms (Librea-Carden et al, 2021). Inclusive classrooms typically involve students with disabilities, a special education (SPED) teacher, a general education teacher, and students without disabilities.…”
Section: Inclusive Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Üçüncüsü, Bilimsel Bilginin Yaratıcılığa ve Hayal Gücüne Bağlılığı, bilimsel bilginin deneysel veriler ile elde edildiğini ancak bu süreçte insanın hayal gücünün önemli bir rolü olduğunu ifade eder Lederman & Lederman, 2014;McComas, 1998). Bilim hem mantığın hem de hayal gücünün bir birleşimidir (Librea-Carden, 2018). Dördüncüsü, Bilimsel Bilginin Öznelliği, bilim insanlarının çalışmalarını yaparken, ön yargılarını, durumlara bakış açılarını ve inançlarını çalışmalarına dâhil ettikleri ve bu nedenle öznel oldukları ifade eder .…”
Section: Bilimsel Bilginin Doğasıunclassified