2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7838-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Activity as an Interpretative Practice. Empiricism, Constructivism and Pragmatism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the image of a patchwork of theories, laws, and disciplines without a hierarchical order or systematic relationship defended by N. Cartwright (1999) seems a more appropriate vision of the structure of science. Philosophy of science plays the part of authorised interpreter of the scientific practices, the epistemological orientations that guide scientific procedure, and of the attitudes towards science (Perdomo, 2014). It must do that through dialogue between those involved in undertaking, and criticise the epistemic injustice and exclusions in our democratic societies, scientific practices.…”
Section: Science As An Inclusive and Diverse Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the image of a patchwork of theories, laws, and disciplines without a hierarchical order or systematic relationship defended by N. Cartwright (1999) seems a more appropriate vision of the structure of science. Philosophy of science plays the part of authorised interpreter of the scientific practices, the epistemological orientations that guide scientific procedure, and of the attitudes towards science (Perdomo, 2014). It must do that through dialogue between those involved in undertaking, and criticise the epistemic injustice and exclusions in our democratic societies, scientific practices.…”
Section: Science As An Inclusive and Diverse Practicementioning
confidence: 99%