Scientific and social challenges for clinical psychology

Cierpiałkowska, Lidia; Sęk, Helena

doi:10.18290/rpsych.2016.19.3-1en

Cited by 11 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is also consistent with Jerzy Brzeziński's comprehensive model: Scientific Research and Professional Practice in Psychology (SRPPP) (Brzeziński, 2016b). The editors of the most important Polish textbook in clinical psychology, Psychologia kliniczna [Clinical Psychology], Lidia Cierpiałkowska and Helena Sęk (Cierpiałkowska & Sęk, 2016b) wrote in a text describing the current state and developmental trends of clinical psychology (Cierpiałkowska & Sęk, 2016a): "The scientific level of clinical psychology is determined by creating a theory, adhering to methodological assumptions, and conducting modern research. Therefore, interrelations between theory and practice constantly constitute a subject for reflection and an area with new tasks to undertake" (pp.…”

Section: Empirical Theory -Test Theory -Professional Practice: Diagnosupporting

confidence: 65%

Data integration levels. Between scientific research and professional practice in clinical psychology

Brzeziński¹

2017

Current Issues in Personality Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article deals with the question of linking two spheres: research practice (psychology as empirical science) and professional practice 1 (psychology as a scientifically and ethically meaningful practical action: diagnostic and therapeutic). The author assumes that the most important task of psychologists is to create testable (in Popper's sense) empirical theories. Only based on these can professional practice be built (here: clinical -diagnostic and therapeutic). The effectiveness of clinicians' professional actions in the sphere of social practice is a derivative of the method of practical action: diagnostic and therapeutic, built on this knowledge. The author formulates a strong thesis that beyond the context of proven empirical theory, there is no sensible, and yet ethical, professional practice. The article consists of two parts. The first part deals with the methodological aspects of the relationship: empirical theory -testing of the theory -professional practice. It also applies to evidence-based assessment (EBA) and evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP). The clinician uses a variety of data in his/her (scientific and practical) work, which raises the problem of how to integrate these data. This is the second part of the article. The author distinguishes four levels of data integration:(1) construction of variables and the building of hypothetical relationships between them; (2) operationalisation of variables, i.e. the transmission of variables from level I of the empirical sense; (3) quantitative interpretation of empirical research -here the interpretative framework is the psychological test theory (or another tool used in the operationalisation procedure); (4) qualitative (clinical) interpretation developed on level III data -the psychological empirical theory here provides the interpretative framework. At each level, we are dealing with theories. The empirical data that emerge are indirectly brought forward and justified by these theories. These levels are somewhat dependent on each other. In other words, we are dealing with integration within each level and between levels.Research practice -professional practice 164 current issues in personality psychology

show abstract

Section: Empirical Theory -Test Theory -Professional Practice: Diagnosupporting

confidence: 65%

Data integration levels. Between scientific research and professional practice in clinical psychology

Brzeziński¹

2017

Current Issues in Personality Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They coexist with relatively permanent patterns of coping with stress and patterns of interpersonal strategies. These, in turn, consolidate these inadequate beliefs and assumptions [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…By contrast, the notions of conflict focus on contradiction within the intrapsychic world. There are also conceptualizations which prove that psychopathology of personality may be explained simultaneously within the conflict and the deficit model [1]. In the cognitive approach to borderline personality disorders, an interaction of three factors is emphasized: innate predispositions, learned features and traumatic events which generate disorder-specific false beliefs about self and others and the surrounding world.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parental attitudes and intensification of borderline personality traits: the mediational role of self-control and identity integration

Kwapis¹,

Prusak²,

Pohl³

et al. 2023

Psychiatr Pol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cel pracyCelem artykułu jest ustalenie związku między postawami rodzicielskimi, samokontrolą, integracją tożsamości a cechami zaburzenia osobowości borderline (ZOB) w nieklinicznej próbie osób dorosłych, a także określenie roli samokontroli i integracji tożsamości jako predyktorów ZOB oraz jako potencjalnych mediatorów związku postaw rodzicielskich z cechami ZOB.MetodaBadania zostały przeprowadzone z udziałem 162 osób dorosłych pochodzących z populacji ogólnej, które wypełniały Kwestionariusz Retrospektywnej Oceny Postaw Rodziców (KPR-Roc) Plopy, podskalę Kwestionariusza Styl Życia 05/SK Trzebińskiej, podskalę „Integracja Tożsamości” Wielowymiarowego Kwestionariusza Samooceny MSEI autorstwa O’Brien i Epsteina w polskiej adaptacji Fecenec oraz Skalę Samokontroli (SCS) autorstwa Tangney i in. w adaptacji Kwapisa i Bartczuka.WynikiOtrzymane wyniki wskazują na istotne korelacje samokontroli i integracji tożsamości z postawami rodzicielskimi (z wyjątkiem postawy nadmiernie ochraniającej obojga rodziców), a także ujemne korelacje zarówno integracji tożsamości, jak i samokontroli z nasileniem cech ZOB. Zgodnie z wyniki uzyskanymi za pomocą modelowania strukturalnego, niekonsekwentna postawa matki i integracja tożsamości mają wyłącznie bezpośredni wpływ na cechy ZOB, natomiast nadmiernie wymagająca postawa matki i samokontrola wpływają na nasilenie tych cech jedynie pośrednio. Niekonsekwentna postawa ojca wywiera na cechy ZOB wpływ zarówno bezpośredni, jak i pośredni. Mediatorami związku nadmiernie wymagającej postawy matki i niekonsekwentnej postawy ojca z cechami ZOB są samokontrola i integracja tożsamości. Wpływ samokontroli na nasilenie cech ZOB jest zapośredniczony przez integrację tożsamości.WnioskiPostawy rodzicielskie matki i ojca mają związek z samokontrolą, integracją tożsamości i nasileniem cech ZOB. Samokontrola i integracja tożsamości są mediatorami wpływu wybranych postaw rodzicielskich na nasilenie cech ZOB.

show abstract

“…As an aftermath, some of the psychologists involved in this movement were imprisoned or forced to work in factories, while those who were not part of it were transferred to other departments, like Educational Sciences and Philosophy (David et al, 2002). Another example is Poland, where the psychology profession was eliminated and psychological testing forbidden between 1950 and 1956, in practice psychologists performing the attribution of psychiatric assistants, something similar to a lab technician or social worker (Cierpiałkowska & Sęk, 2016). After these years of crisis (politically, corresponding to the affirmation of Polish independence in reference to the USSR), however, psychology in Poland reasserted itself as a scientific discipline and valuable practice that was applied to the clinical field as well.…”

Section: David and S Stefanmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After these years of crisis (politically, corresponding to the affirmation of Polish independence in reference to the USSR), however, psychology in Poland reasserted itself as a scientific discipline and valuable practice that was applied to the clinical field as well. Clinical psychology conferences were organized starting the 1950s, and, after the 1960s, departments and units of clinical psychology were organized in universities (see Cierpiałkowska & Sęk, 2016).…”

Section: David and S Stefanmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Perspectives on Psychotherapy

Hofmann¹

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

show abstract

Scientific and social challenges for clinical psychology

Cited by 11 publications

References 17 publications

Data integration levels. Between scientific research and professional practice in clinical psychology

Data integration levels. Between scientific research and professional practice in clinical psychology

Parental attitudes and intensification of borderline personality traits: the mediational role of self-control and identity integration

International Perspectives on Psychotherapy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About