2020
DOI: 10.1177/0033688220936764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Mapping of English Language Teaching Research in the Philippines: A Bibliometric Review of Doctoral and Master’s Theses (2010–2018)

Abstract: Very few studies have comprehensively mapped out the landscape of English language teaching (ELT) research, particularly those that are not accessible to wider international readership. Thus, this bibliometric study examines ELT doctoral and master’s theses in the Philippines. A total of 98 theses and dissertations completed between 2010 and 2018 were collected from various Philippine universities. Quantitative analysis was used to examine the characteristics and topical foci of the selected studies. Findings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten were quantitative studies that employed structured questionnaires and survey to determine RP and factors that impact their RP of various academic staff (Austria & Cabonero, 2020;Capulso, 2020;Esponilla, 2015;Gamuza & Pacolor, 2019;Gonzales et al, 2020;Mala & Canencia, 2021;Meneses & Moreno, 2019;Ramoso & Ortega-Dela Cruz, 2019;Torres et al, 2017;Wong, 2019). Five were bibliometric data reviews of published research articles in different areas and disciplines of both hard and soft sciences (Barrot et al, 2020;Gravoso et al, 2016;Navarrete & Asio, 2014;Reyes & Reyes, 2015;Vinluan, 2012). Three were qualitative studies that employed interviews and FGDs of institutional stakeholders concerning RP (Calma, 2010;Gomba & Pacolor, 2014;Quitoras & Abuso, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ten were quantitative studies that employed structured questionnaires and survey to determine RP and factors that impact their RP of various academic staff (Austria & Cabonero, 2020;Capulso, 2020;Esponilla, 2015;Gamuza & Pacolor, 2019;Gonzales et al, 2020;Mala & Canencia, 2021;Meneses & Moreno, 2019;Ramoso & Ortega-Dela Cruz, 2019;Torres et al, 2017;Wong, 2019). Five were bibliometric data reviews of published research articles in different areas and disciplines of both hard and soft sciences (Barrot et al, 2020;Gravoso et al, 2016;Navarrete & Asio, 2014;Reyes & Reyes, 2015;Vinluan, 2012). Three were qualitative studies that employed interviews and FGDs of institutional stakeholders concerning RP (Calma, 2010;Gomba & Pacolor, 2014;Quitoras & Abuso, 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, low research capability is directly linked with the limited knowledge of faculty members in aspects of research (Wong, 2019). This can be attributed to the low enrollment and attrition of these faculty members in graduate programs (Barrot et al, 2020). Regardless of one's research knowledge and academic experiences, some faculty members are still hesitant to undertake research activities that can be a result of institutional restrictions (Mala & Canencia, 2021).…”
Section: Struggle For Legitimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to creating ideas, developing the suitable method is needed in writing a thesis. The scientific method plays a crucial role in determining the feasibility of a study (Barrot et al, 2020;Greenberg, 2015), so the scientific method in each research is different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a new trend for several bibliometric studies to examine publications in certain fields of studies across regions, territories and countries (Barrot et al , 2020; Nguyễn et al , 2020; Lei and Liao, 2017; Riazi et al , 2020). The linguistic field of study is no exception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%