2016
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E 228) as food additives

Abstract: The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion re‐evaluating sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E 228) when used as food additives. The Panel noted that sulfur dioxide, bisulfite and sulfite ions existed in a series of equilibria and that these would favour bisulfite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EFSA, in its Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of sulphites as food additives, also notes that sulphites can exacerbate allergic symptoms, especially in patients with asthma, as well as in those with other atopic problems. In addition, experts note the symptoms of various organs and suggest that some may be genetically determined [ 61 ].…”
Section: Adverse Reactions To Food Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFSA, in its Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of sulphites as food additives, also notes that sulphites can exacerbate allergic symptoms, especially in patients with asthma, as well as in those with other atopic problems. In addition, experts note the symptoms of various organs and suggest that some may be genetically determined [ 61 ].…”
Section: Adverse Reactions To Food Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfur salts have a wide range of agricultural and environmental uses, as they are currently considered safe for human ingestion when applied at suitable concentrations [23,51,52]. These food additives are used both in the food processing industry (e.g., wines and some liquors) and the fresh fruit industry, specifically as postharvest treatments for grapes (sulfur dioxide fumigations or in-package sodium metabisulfite pads) for the control of gray mold caused by B. cinerea [51,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature suggests that sulfur-containing salts, such as metabisulfites and aluminum-containing sulfates, are effective salts to control some important postharvest diseases of horticultural produce. Although sulfites (SO 3 2− ), bisul-fites (HSO 3 − ), and metabisulfites (S 2 O 5 2− ) have been sometimes linked to adverse allergies [21,22], the compounds in the sulfites group (E-numbers E 220-228) are currently approved as food additives for different uses on whole fresh fruits and vegetables [23]. Likewise, nowadays, the aluminum sulfates (E-numbers E 520-523) are considered of minimal human health concern in the regulated uses, after re-evaluation by the EFSA in 2018 [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) delivered a scientific opinion re-evaluating sulfur dioxide (E 220) along with sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E 228) when used as food additives (EFSA ANS Panel, 2016). Sulfur dioxide-sulfites (E 220-228) are authorised overall in 40 food categories in the EU according to Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 5 with maximum permitted levels (MPLs) ranging from 20 to 2,000 mg/kg.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%