2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific sensemaking supports science content learning across disciplines and instructional contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sufficient information about each topic was also provided within the assessments so that students with different levels of prior knowledge on the topic could still succeed on the assessments. Providing strong evidence of validity, scores on these measures were found to be highly predictive of how much science content students learned during a semester of science class regardless of grade-level (6th, 8th, or 9th grades), disciplines (life sciences or physical sciences), or type of instruction (textbook vs. hands-on instruction; teachercentric vs. student-centric classroom discourse) (Cannady et al, 2019;Vincent-Ruz & Schunn, 2017). Further, similar student estimates were obtained from pure multiplechoice assessments compared to assessments involving open-ended responses scored with rubrics (Bathgate et al, 2015).…”
Section: Scientific Sensemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sufficient information about each topic was also provided within the assessments so that students with different levels of prior knowledge on the topic could still succeed on the assessments. Providing strong evidence of validity, scores on these measures were found to be highly predictive of how much science content students learned during a semester of science class regardless of grade-level (6th, 8th, or 9th grades), disciplines (life sciences or physical sciences), or type of instruction (textbook vs. hands-on instruction; teachercentric vs. student-centric classroom discourse) (Cannady et al, 2019;Vincent-Ruz & Schunn, 2017). Further, similar student estimates were obtained from pure multiplechoice assessments compared to assessments involving open-ended responses scored with rubrics (Bathgate et al, 2015).…”
Section: Scientific Sensemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These skills provide the foundation for scientific thinking that helps learners purposefully build and connect knowledge across scientific contexts (Berland et al, 2015;Kapon, 2016). Because these skills are not content-specific, they support learners in engaging with novel contexts and understanding the content within them (Bathgate, Crowell, Cannady, Dorph, & Schunn, 2015;Cannady, Vincent-Ruz, Chung, & Schunn, 2019). Based on the Activation Lab framework, an "activated science learner" is someone who can apply scientific practices and existing content knowledge to understand novel scientific situations.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, students were reluctant to ask questions when they did not understand the learning materials. Science learning must provide a learning process that can accommodate competence (cognitive), attitude (affective), and skills (psycho-motor) of the student (Cannady et al, 2019;Trefil & Hazen, 2016;Tursinawati, 2015). Therefore, science learning is not only limited to understanding the concepts of science but also involves other activities to optimize the attitudes and skills of students through a process of discovery to find out about science systematically (Budwig, 2015;Chiappetta & Koballa, 2010;Timostsuk & Jaanila, 2015).…”
Section: A R T I C L E I N F Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement of superior human resources in the future is vital to improve the quality of education, one of which is by improving the quality of learning (Artuner, Uzun, & Ilbars, 2012;Gajardo & Carmenado, 2012;Reisner et al, 2017). Learning is an effort in the delivery of knowledge (Cannady, Vincent-Ruz, Chung, & Schunn, 2019), organizing and creating a learning environment system with various methods (Falloon, 2019;Sanchez & Weber, 2019). So that students can carry out the activities of learning effectively and efficiently and can achieve optimal learning outcomes (Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, Joosten-ten Brinke, & Kester, 2019;Zendler & Reile, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student learning will be carried out using a scientific approach. A scientific approach aims to obtain systematic scientific knowledge (Cannady, Vincent-Ruz, Chung, & Schunn, 2019;Hernawati, Amin, Irawati, Indriwati, & Omar, 2018;Syahroni, Dewi, & Kasmui, 2016;Triyuni, 2016). The first step in the scientific learning process is observing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%