Scientific Technologies of National Identity as Colonial Legacies

Abstract

This paper examines how Spanish techno-scientific discourses and practices shaped metropolitan Spanish and colonial Guinean bodies and identities. It focuses on the range of technologies of biopower--from fingerprinting and blood testing to racial and geographic discourses--that constituted Guinean bodies in ambivalent ways during two periods: the first decades of the 20th century, and the post-Civil War period of the Francoist regime. In the first decades of the 20th century, blood tests were imposed on the local population as a legal requirement for obtaining identity cards in colonial Guinea; the identity cards offered them a severely restricted citizen status, especially if they were female. Indeed, the new blood testing technologies played a key role in efforts to control, reform and identify 'natives', less as subjects than as labouring bodies. During Franco's dictatorship, following the end of the Spanish Civil War (1939), the colonies became a space for the reconstruction of a unified Spanish national identity through two key strategies: 'detribalization' and 'hispanicization', which were carried out through a web of techno-scientific practices--in medicine and psychology as well as geography and anthropology--that included fingerprinting, blood testing, measurements of intelligence and racial discourses. Under the Franco regime, these practices not only justified violent, racist forms of exploitation, but were also used to stake a claim on Guinean colonial territories and bodies by emptying them of their existing identities and then reconstituting them under a single Spanish national identity.

The Changing Nature of Modernization Discourses in Documentary Films

“…Some of the natives were thus trained and enlisted to perform technical albeit clearly subaltern tasks, as medical or laboratory assistants and nurses. In this way, they were allowed to be part of the modernizing endeavor (included), although always short of reaching the decision-making ranks (so, in the end, excluded) (Medina-Doménech 2009; Kusiak 2010; Tabernero et al 2017).…”

Interrogating Madrid's “Slum of Shame”: Urban Expansion, Race, and Place-Based Activisms in the Cañada Real Galiana

“…Yet sites of difference can also be spaces in which to exercise autonomy and articulate a particular identity (Jacobs ; Yiftachel ). However, while there has been recent interest in Spanish imaginaries of race both historically (Goode ; Martin‐Márquez ; Medina‐Doménech ; Schmidt‐Nowara ) and contemporarily (Flesler ; Ugarte ), analyses of the Spanish neoliberal project have largely ignored such questions, eliding the ways in which notions of racial difference influenced urbanization and dispossession.…”