Scientific Wealth in Middle East and North Africa: Productivity, Indigeneity, and Specialty in 1981–2013

Abstract

Several developing countries seek to build knowledge-based economies by attempting to expand scientific research capabilities. Characterizing the state and direction of progress in this arena is challenging but important. Here, we employ three metrics: a classical metric of productivity (publications per person), an adapted metric which we denote as Revealed Scientific Advantage (developed from work used to compare publications in scientific fields among countries) to characterize disciplinary specialty, and a new metric, scientific indigeneity (defined as the ratio of publications with domestic corresponding authors) to characterize the locus of scientific activity that also serves as a partial proxy for local absorptive capacity. These metrics—using population and publications data that are available for most countries–allow the characterization of some key features of national scientific enterprise. The trends in productivity and indigeneity when compared across other countries and regions can serve as indicators of strength or fragility in the national research ecosystems, and the trends in specialty can allow regional policy makers to assess the extent to which the areas of focus of research align (or not align) with regional priorities. We apply the metrics to study the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)—a region where science and technology capacity will play a key role in national economic diversification. We analyze 9.8 million publication records between 1981–2013 in 17 countries of MENA from Morocco to Iraq and compare it to selected countries throughout the world. The results show that international collaborators increasingly drove the scientific activity in MENA. The median indigeneity reached 52% in 2013 (indicating that almost half of the corresponding authors were located in foreign countries). Additionally, the regional disciplinary focus in chemical and petroleum engineering is waning with modest growth in the life sciences. We find repeated patterns of stagnation and contraction of scientific activity for several MENA countries contributing to a widening productivity gap on an international comparative yardstick. The results prompt questions about the strength of the developing scientific enterprise and highlight the need for consistent long-term policy for effectively addressing regional challenges with domestic research.

National scientific performance evolution patterns: Retrenchment, successful expansion, or overextension

“…The Scopus categorization scheme might also affect the results because it classifies by journal rather than by article (Waltman & van Eck, ) and might therefore be misleading if any country tends to publish in multidisciplinary journals within a given field. The findings may not apply to countries with historically smaller science systems, which may follow different publication, collaboration, and productivity logics (Siddiqi et al, ). A particularly important exception is Saudi Arabia, with a rapidly growing publication output.…”

“…It is not useful to compare the overall output of a country with its average impact because the output is influenced by the productivity and size of a country. For example, Russia and China produce large volumes of research primarily because they are large countries, irrespective of the efficiency of their research (see also: Siddiqi, Stoppani, Anadon, & Narayanamurti, ). Thus, relational tests were used to assess whether expansion in a research system associates with increased average impact.…”

Comparing the gender diversity and affiliation trends of the authors for two orthopaedics journals from the Arab world

“… 9 The authorship gender gap in medical and surgical fields has become a specific area of concern in the past decade. 1 , 2 , 5 , 10 , 20 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 Although there has been excellent advancement in the Arab world's scientific research activities in the last decade, 32 the existing bibliometric studies monitoring this advancement are deficient.…”

Challenges Facing Clinical Research: An Example From a Middle Eastern Country

“…On the other hand, it can be appreciated as a positive outcome as 35% have enough time to conduct research. The latter is clearly not an ambitious perception if more research output is desired keeping in mind the modest research conducted in the ME region in general (Siddiqi, Stoppani, Anadon, & Narayanamurti, 2016).…”