Scientific Writing of Novice Researchers: What Difficulties and Encouragements Do They Encounter?

Abstract

Purpose Writing scientific articles is a daunting task for novice researchers. In this qualitative study carried out in 2007, the authors evaluated the experiences of a group of novice researchers engaged in the writing process, to elucidate the main difficulties and sources of encouragement they encountered. Method Sixteen novice researchers were interviewed. Most were women (10), and most were enrolled in programs of medicine (9), followed by nursing (4) and physical therapy (3). These were drawn via convenience sampling from a randomized control trial in which 48 of them were equally assigned to either an online or a face-to-face course of instruction. On completion, interviews were conducted in focus groups of four students each. The interviews were transcribed and read independently by two of the authors, who then encoded the material based on the principles of grounded theory. Initial categories were converted to major emerging themes, which were validated when participants were asked to review the findings. Triangulation of results was carried out by discussing the emerging themes in an online forum with five specialists in college writing education. Results Classifying the diverse responses of participants led to the emergence of four major themes: cognitive burden, group support and mentoring, difficulty in distinguishing between content and structure, and backward design of manuscripts. Conclusions The themes produced by this study provide some insight into the challenges faced by novice researchers in their early attempts at scientific writing. Remedies that address these challenges are needed to substantially improve scientific writing instruction. Writing scientific articles is a daunting task for novice researchers. We carried out the qualitative study described below to evaluate the experiences of a group of novice researchers engaged in the writing process, to elucidate the main difficulties and sources of encouragement they encountered.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in necrotising soft tissue infections: a study of patients in the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample

“…We performed a retrospective study on patients in the NIS database from 1988 to 2009. The templates and material developed by the Research on Research group, for formulating a research question (Question Diagram) and writing the manuscript, while conducting this secondary data analysis/study were used [9,10]. All patients in the NIS database who have NSTI were included in the study.…”

Tıp Eğitimi Alanındaki Üç Önemli Dergide Türkiye Kökenli Yayınlar

“…"MedicalEducation", John Wiley&Sons yayıncılık tarafından Tıp Eğitimi Çalışmaları Derneği (ASME) adına yılda 12 sayı olarak 1966 yılından itibaren yayınlanmaktadır [7]. [8][9][10][11]. Özellikle ülkemizde uluslararası akademik kabul gören Türkçe dergi sayısının az olması dil sorunu ile yayın yapmayı daha da güç hale getirmektedir.…”

The Writing Retreat: A High-Yield Clinical Faculty Development Opportunity in Academic Writing

“…In addition, the immediate ability of senior faculty to answer organizational, semantic, and stylistic questions guided junior authors to a better understanding of the distinction between content and structure in a manuscript. 14 The pairing of junior and senior authors clarified the goals of each paper, and mitigated the lack of focus that often plagues early manuscript drafts. The immediacy of editorial feedback in a writing retreat decreases turnaround time for drafts and accelerates manuscript production.…”

“…7,8 A dedicated writing retreat overcomes procrastination, apprehension, anxiety, and perceived lack of time aptly described as ''cognitive burden'' 14 by providing time and space to write. Lessons learned from participants in these venues validate our own approach to ensuring academic productivity.…”