“…Technological innovation may be able to produce more efficient and effective teaching and learning activities at a local, national and international level, when used for strategic purposes, in particular contexts and areas (Valdez, McNabb, Foertsch, Anderson, Hawkes, & Raack, 2000) and if conceived as a "keystone" to increase the quality of teaching and learning, as well as research, in a situation where European higher education is currently experiencing a state of "stalemate" and a continuing reduction of resources for teaching and research facilities. However, the current debate on the role and use of new technologies in the higher education system, both in terms of teaching and research, on what leads to the discussion of the criteria that the university community processes to define what qualifies something (in terms of technology) as being of high academic quality, and currently indicates the need for empirical evidence and research methods with a scientific basis (Ehrmann, 1997(Ehrmann, , 1999 that confirms the usefulness of technology (Roblyer & Knezek, 2003;Dede, 2004;Hostetler, 2005;Thompson, 2005), as has been happening since 2001 in the United States for the No Child Left Behind Act (NCBL), the SBR, which is trying to conduct analysis and measurements which examine the relationship between technology and teaching-learning processes. This debate will surely advance the 'high quality' of educational research in terms of technology, but is raising questions about the application of these devices both in the classroom and in the laboratory.…”