2005
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientifically Based Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The online discourse literature continues to call for robust theory and methodology to examine interaction quality (e.g., Cazden, 2001) and to inform best practice (Thompson, 2005) through significant longitudinal studies (e.g., Flynn & Polin, 2003;Rourke, Anderson, Garrison, & Archer, 2001). Research methods, although useful, have remained focused upon structural and discourse content analyses (e.g., Fahy, Crawford, & Ally, 2001;Henri, 1992) and covered a relatively short time frame (e.g., Gunawardena, Lowe, & Anderson, 1997), thus failing to explain how dialogues may influence decisions.…”
Section: Research Design Methods and Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The online discourse literature continues to call for robust theory and methodology to examine interaction quality (e.g., Cazden, 2001) and to inform best practice (Thompson, 2005) through significant longitudinal studies (e.g., Flynn & Polin, 2003;Rourke, Anderson, Garrison, & Archer, 2001). Research methods, although useful, have remained focused upon structural and discourse content analyses (e.g., Fahy, Crawford, & Ally, 2001;Henri, 1992) and covered a relatively short time frame (e.g., Gunawardena, Lowe, & Anderson, 1997), thus failing to explain how dialogues may influence decisions.…”
Section: Research Design Methods and Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological innovation may be able to produce more efficient and effective teaching and learning activities at a local, national and international level, when used for strategic purposes, in particular contexts and areas (Valdez, McNabb, Foertsch, Anderson, Hawkes, & Raack, 2000) and if conceived as a "keystone" to increase the quality of teaching and learning, as well as research, in a situation where European higher education is currently experiencing a state of "stalemate" and a continuing reduction of resources for teaching and research facilities. However, the current debate on the role and use of new technologies in the higher education system, both in terms of teaching and research, on what leads to the discussion of the criteria that the university community processes to define what qualifies something (in terms of technology) as being of high academic quality, and currently indicates the need for empirical evidence and research methods with a scientific basis (Ehrmann, 1997(Ehrmann, , 1999 that confirms the usefulness of technology (Roblyer & Knezek, 2003;Dede, 2004;Hostetler, 2005;Thompson, 2005), as has been happening since 2001 in the United States for the No Child Left Behind Act (NCBL), the SBR, which is trying to conduct analysis and measurements which examine the relationship between technology and teaching-learning processes. This debate will surely advance the 'high quality' of educational research in terms of technology, but is raising questions about the application of these devices both in the classroom and in the laboratory.…”
Section: The Relationship Between "Core Competencies" Of the Teaching...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have emphasized the unique contributions that multimedia brings to the learning experience [3] [4]. According to Mayer [5], interactive multimedia is PAPER DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE COURSEWARE FOR THE ENHANCEMENT OF E-LEARNING one of the best technologies to help students learn.…”
Section: B Multimedia Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%