1987
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.148.1.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scintigraphic diagnosis of sacral fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most sensitive tests to detect these fractures is bone scintigraphy with technetium Tc99-labeled methylene diphosphonate [ 16 ], which has 96% sensitivity and 92% positive predictive value for detecting these fractures. "Honda" or "H" sign in bone scan is diagnostic of SIFs [ 17 ]. Posterior planar images with the sacrum closer to the detector are very sensitive to diagnose these fractures [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most sensitive tests to detect these fractures is bone scintigraphy with technetium Tc99-labeled methylene diphosphonate [ 16 ], which has 96% sensitivity and 92% positive predictive value for detecting these fractures. "Honda" or "H" sign in bone scan is diagnostic of SIFs [ 17 ]. Posterior planar images with the sacrum closer to the detector are very sensitive to diagnose these fractures [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, further radiological methods are necessary. The highest sensitivity of 96% offers scintigraphy who shows the typical H-sign (shaped as the car enterprises logo Honda) 6 . On the other hand computertomography with the reduced sensitivity of 50–75% should be combined with the elevated MRI-technology 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Honda or “H” sign in bone scan was used to diagnose SIFs. [ 35 ] However, SIFs do not always symmetrically involve bilateral alar areas, possibly accounting for different target sites while performing sacroplasty in SIFs. [ 36 ] In this study, we described the methods of reading MR images for SIFs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%