2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scleral cross-linking using riboflavin and ultraviolet-A radiation for prevention of progressive myopia in a rabbit model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…5 More recently, the “CXL” approach has been used successfully to halt axial elongation in visually form-deprived rabbits (by tarsorrhaphy), although multiple regions of posterior sclera required separate irradiation zones. 6 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 More recently, the “CXL” approach has been used successfully to halt axial elongation in visually form-deprived rabbits (by tarsorrhaphy), although multiple regions of posterior sclera required separate irradiation zones. 6 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corneal stiffening has become a clinical therapy for keratoconus and other corneal conditions (Iseli et al, 2008; Wollensak et al, 2003). Stiffening of the posterior sclera has also been proposed as a potential treatment for glaucoma (Campbell et al, 2017; Coudrillier et al, 2016; Kimball et al, 2014) and myopia (Dotan et al, 2014; Liu et al, 2016; Wollensak and Spoerl, 2004). It would therefore be interesting to evaluate the level of changes in dynamic IOP that can be expected with localized stiffening of the ocular shell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduction 3 of the UV light intensity down to 3 mW/cm 2 for 30 min (5.4 J/cm 2 ) of SXL treatment 4 avoided these degenerative side effects and maintained strengthening effects for the 5 scleral tissue(Wollensak and Iomdina, 2009). In another study, a total UVA light dose 6 of 57J/cm 2 and riboflavin were used for the SXL treatment in very young rabbits and 7 no retinal damage was detected(Dotan et al, 2014). The surprising differences in the 8 damage thresholds of approximately 5.4 J/cm 2 or 57 J/cm 2 UVA vs. 240 J/cm 2 blue 9 light (200 mW/cm 2 for 20 min in the presented results) might be explained by different 10 absorption characteristics of the scleral tissue/proteins/molecules for different 11 wavelengths, causing different tissue damaging effects(Wu et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%