2008
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scopolamine Effects Under a Titrating-Delayed-Nonmatching-to-Position Procedure

Abstract: In a study of working memory, the performance of rats under titrating-delayednonmatching-to-position (TDNMTP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the terminal retention intervals in our study are substantially longer than those produced by comparable procedures in animals given fewer sessions [41], [46], [47]. Thus, the TDMTP procedure used here might be a good choice for future studies evaluating the effects of working-memory training on subsequent delay discounting in rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Indeed, the terminal retention intervals in our study are substantially longer than those produced by comparable procedures in animals given fewer sessions [41], [46], [47]. Thus, the TDMTP procedure used here might be a good choice for future studies evaluating the effects of working-memory training on subsequent delay discounting in rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…First, it is possible that the working-memory ability of the WMT rats did not improve (relative to the Sham-trained rats) by the working-memory training that was provided. One piece of evidence against this is the posttraining retention intervals across which our rats remembered the sample stimulus are, to the best or our knowledge, the highest reported in the titrating-delay match-to-position literature (e.g., Porritt & Poling, 2008, using a similar procedure, reported a mean peak retention interval of 32.85 s, SEM = 4.56, whereas our WMT rats achieved a mean peak retention interval of 68.32 s, SEM = 5.71, in the posttraining reassessment of working memory). More robust evidence that WMT positively impacted working-memory ability would have been obtained had WMT rats performed better than Sham rats in a novel working-memory task (for review of rodent working-memory preparations, see Dudchenko, 2004; Pontecorvo, Sahgal, & Steckler, 1996) and future studies might include such a posttraining test phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Working-memory training (WMT). Rats assigned to the WMT group completed 140 WMT sessions in which they earned food by making correct choices in a modified TDMTP task (see, e.g., Kangas et al, 2010;Porritt & Poling, 2008). In this procedure, rats were required to remember a cue over a delay period (i.e., retention interval) in which the cue was absent.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relações de identidade de cor ou forma, ou seja, a escolha definida como correta é a do estímulo de comparação com cor ou forma igual a do modelo, foram requeridas em 13 dos 21 experimentos. Dois estudos (Porritt & Poling, 2008;Robinson, Scheff, Pierre-Louis, & Han, 2000) utilizaram tarefas de escolha da posição diferente (oddity ou non matching) e três o MTS arbitrário. Neste último, o modelo e o estímulo de comparação correspondente não apresentam semelhança física; a relação é definida pelo experimentador (e.g., uma forma abstrata e um som).…”
Section: Tipos De Discriminações Condicionaisunclassified